Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108029
Return-Path: <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 18007 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2020 13:36:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp4.php.net) (45.112.84.5)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2020 13:36:58 -0000
Received: from php-smtp4.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32241804D1
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed,  8 Jan 2020 03:42:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp4.php.net
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-ASN: AS15169 209.85.128.0/17
X-Spam-Virus: No
X-Envelope-From: <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lf1-f49.google.com (mail-lf1-f49.google.com [209.85.167.49])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)
	 key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256)
	(No client certificate requested)
	by php-smtp4.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed,  8 Jan 2020 03:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-f49.google.com with SMTP id n12so2214560lfe.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 08 Jan 2020 03:42:20 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=OepXxioAlAE43dG7IeW4AgGTaxNaTQA7rtnarTNyEdA=;
        b=mohtZihH37JZvMidbxM6is5I08y9d0arhN2+TUSD80vLnR2a+d7iCYzWZqIeDgUyvD
         wvS4QYHRRMyODo8KP1ZL5jBl5OJ2a2qtpq+783REZwBBdvb9K9fQ9BJh5UC0htsvX8L3
         Jx0eARtPCMKtNbYcKjHZjH4+DjgA4vBpLE7VwaGII4ZtfjUdxovsJaWkneTLrrqcdWZk
         095OeHOL7IeUNM5zW7qHrqNi1SLQgyhTc8HCaRgdG474dVPFrPusrk2nd+bG/l0cfKm2
         Ol4Dc59UucW1mhmvsG6RVOPINfLGWLyT8PKjEhN4H4inUKSBr0dqZP1qaYNUlm576UZ6
         JEWA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
        bh=OepXxioAlAE43dG7IeW4AgGTaxNaTQA7rtnarTNyEdA=;
        b=iUILJcIWcm/lkY/I8WnvyahKtxtjnDAOiZg/PRamFwfc7CVv2YA4L+4E0TurYgTLxl
         MnbFzZ5XcYxoP0IIz5JDdcoKzpJy+yEqBBaljZl1r4Q2p/Rml+RcJDC4FpzrdYPUiDSg
         af6g7/CChAJ2AJtBw7VCHaFE4HLMLzghqtaB17k6beQ4WFF9EPMuW/7ZXHhU3f42udpz
         Xjo0mP08J0LiDdRA15CLnGtq1O3GV14wVhN/LDMspGoDZv0oJVLQyGNvF/SqdNs8hOTr
         A6jRdt8bGmohNJ3DbEU48el2Al8Tmh56YaXiKNoO2/uPPcRyma2hCY8kSXRGxr/VBtg7
         ZpPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXEZXG50EzI0EQ8myIAPqsX6xQdDQnOnMCuGVT5rDb4xR4/9Qeg
	tM9IoXHR4t1006j0Ci+b1srO5d7X6HRHCBJDuQtrDJsWaYg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdnPbvQsO2lK62jGMjYjxvnYCgfwEKFGBj0HW5Cf4umYJhvNlCcsaCJTMmtW7BXOw8IY+yxtJENr4zua1M4Bw=
X-Received: by 2002:a19:5e16:: with SMTP id s22mr2613760lfb.33.1578483737081;
 Wed, 08 Jan 2020 03:42:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 12:42:01 +0100
Message-ID: <CAF+90c-vPOmHzjoDFNi3m+iTgfz6dJep1DAHuCFcQDctjeEJMg@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006ebd4d059b9f62d8"
Subject: [RFC] Static return type
From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov)

--0000000000006ebd4d059b9f62d8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi internals,

I would like to propose the following RFC, which allows using "static" as a
return type:

https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_return_type

While I'm personally not a fan of late static binding, we do support it and
people do use it quite heavily, so I think we should also support it in
return types.

Regards,
Nikita

--0000000000006ebd4d059b9f62d8--