Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:108003
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAP=4hCKg2efDty5hsttskG9DiuemhbEvYn1p9PtuUpBAiMr91A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c_DnYujrFZLTwmMgoV6LzhwTT=rp8e6jmPZ8VdPNanp5w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c_DnYujrFZLTwmMgoV6LzhwTT=rp8e6jmPZ8VdPNanp5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 10:23:35 +0100
Message-ID: <CAP=4hC+Sm7WYtBrz=1Z6o4zCtLrJbsQdhmpgZ5u00gcuCKrYBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d7a07059b753751"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Ensure correct signatures for PHP magic methods
From: carusogabriel34@gmail.com (Gabriel Caruso)

--0000000000005d7a07059b753751
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, 6 Jan 2020 at 10:05, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 6:44 PM Gabriel Caruso <carusogabriel34@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello Internals,
>>
>> I have a PR proposing to start checking the signatures for PHP magic
>> methods in the next major version of PHP:
>> https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/4177. The idea for this PR came from
>> https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=69718.
>>
>> I'd like to hear your opinion before putting more effort into this :)
>>
>> Best regards.
>>
>
> To be clear, the suggestion here is to verify that no *wrong* types are
> specified -- but not specifying a type at all remains legal, right? If so,
> sounds reasonable to me.
>

Right! If no type is provided no problem but, if provided, then we're going
to check.

Important: *this has nothing to do* with `strict_types` flag enabled or not.


>
> Nikita
>


Best regards,

--0000000000005d7a07059b753751--