Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:107732 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 50835 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2019 13:53:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp3.php.net) (208.43.231.12) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2019 13:53:43 -0000 Received: from php-smtp3.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FB92D1FED; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 04:41:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp3.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_NONE,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS8560 212.227.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 04:41:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1572435691; bh=f/9H28u54wqzkp14cMVebWUF7U+nqycmQcZiyVyrTKI=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ZWxzCI/eHUiWFsYBqYoe+M1ACx9Kl0To1wJLZ5cz9gQhCGXAOrldxkuK5cWomdsMa H9LZBg3c1Z+Hay3J6cCGH81NsWmXCCHeDdBcUP5FhRecMC1d1R4WZvasrDqf4oQG/p 7vmN/UcB+XgBvsoYlH5LFfBlarGqBCqnz6Ksf5bI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.2.144] ([84.179.245.97]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MAONd-1iF1lo06P5-00BvwY; Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:41:31 +0100 To: Joe Watkins , PHP internals References: Message-ID: <7fc5347c-a634-0b68-8b2b-95be6f7d2ce4@gmx.de> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2019 12:41:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:8jnncCHfazfU51nafFeGl/G5/+cA0snK/jH0Hu5lj6TNfSpPpv8 snRdG6+c6o9XkPDiQJuavy9SjDh9fPeilr6F1yj9dU8NLmDMhPFkTCKUVaoxyqd2gVI6sHq tF3TVWSdofl1v8zofmh7pciaKcpvBNNKk3iHtrvBl4LJNhmtH5CfWovBumyI3z5OXdfgiWZ ca5QCmUp2LDHUky7XnodA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:8AiXSofYono=:RM8CSHrVVO5ESRQrOcnvMd qta8oW1q5QMMQAsG0jPKjxSOvaTYAGcucKT472zncFZ3kqJcMPXc8mteRrld86Pm1DOpW1xII FyQfziYHTtFaPm9FxAvDd1nOfvazzVnQPqmn8vJmuzKHup0rBn7Wkl3LuuqOwP3idDpGzoiNE eWkpZc7PInitI3yc+DHnDY/cHjI+4bGNLzgS8HZjA9pDfXoUoiLtAV9u+ITJ9lfXfcL2uoOtn yOzC/mZoUqI/PEONNIcFPE+kHdOaoOJTKYMLQt+yNrVy6j8h0JrbhUHWsyx1onMilOWT8oUnp uexcYcWMHqI6IT2kD6jMf7p8hdrptK2f2PS3LcQWNnxEp4oQXmStPC6Yco5B43HzpTmeqU/2L eo5sxnAmfOZLeAzytH4ARp3eDhtokq8ZjzUC7ycyEtNz/0ZV/xG9fMe42JsqXy4IZzhUquAOu GagmP3Y+e2XSTBwHWBk18Ft4lVPCgFJd1zj4eyRaNpLNKNdpl6ctdYP4buKX9Ezhqe0CRV4zx Qrw575U+yDxH+l+Kp1QN+wm3SCgXLn8iM5ij5jKJfpM1OjJlKnNDaeDTxEUMESgeMb/0GvayI rP5ugK/HX+OX/s3QDo80S3kvq3Acl5WbeFCbV7QxVBn64kStP9aabrkazaNGlDzrOGXvYUCzL 0kz2aG5q291TowynC5R3Nh+Dcenu2N+cBJnfMEbkrGNeVVzthdRo4GTDIs/sTrJQEcBVmnZUF +cM9hed3H/Ymg110GW/DMq+lSxd6lJQevbymmr3tUhFTkVLZjqIkD5QRsJ62mdr0X1A/1iEtJ RiCAdeogqZuEU3a1ynhcOf84+OHTXTXzSinAYbDDVZawft0qEtkHdJXxgLxyKePLTEYdpLYVs dG48DeylyQBTYWrwiOWBF1CUMmvV9G/kx+Cy+YIrNt8C2+w7mdSeD1s9RFPzhMJQiHjaM3bn8 0p6wvTRISa7aLdTbtwb2LDFsEPXx6ML9PrXBU6DbicQ/KcjNak+Bk8sCDsj6U0Dqo2oyg85JB Epgplj5UEOvhGFm7WuHDnAd9s+6Eze8oORUHsoEbH3yI0n8sHUyaDwiZu5jWfsaU1c5kwOSti H2Katw8mrIVkHuLh0V98FZT8/270Byu3MvapvCiDE7NipGTgiZHkO7K71iH7NkNJBXIUU13xl doTXX3yPfIenpZCPuiEY0sfl028M5EFu2BJkpJ0fRvAdPjDdd8jxnr2ZMuQVuCbotdXkXG/RI VrpUFPsnwWVJtC4qpjOgOt7m4+Vw9tVJoIpypDj69AJOLaAoC325drHjqd+o= X-Envelope-From: Subject: Re: FFI & Security From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 14.10.2019 at 09:44, Joe Watkins wrote: > Recently we voted on classification criteria for security bugs [1], we > include under "not an issue" any issue that "requires invocation of > specific code, which may be valid but is obviously malicious". > > I would like to add an explicit clause under the "not an issue" section = for > anything related to FFI. > > It hardly seems worth it to run an RFC, although I'll be happy too if th= ere > is a single dissenting voice. > > If there are no objections, I'll modify the document 7 days from today > (Monday 21st October). > > Cheers > Joe > > [1] https://wiki.php.net/security What is the status here? It seems the security classification document has not yet been updated. Cheers, Christoph