Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:107462 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 19762 invoked from network); 10 Oct 2019 05:52:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp3.php.net) (208.43.231.12) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 10 Oct 2019 05:52:53 -0000 Received: from php-smtp3.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3372A2D20CB for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 20:35:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp3.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No Received: from mail-pl1-x633.google.com (mail-pl1-x633.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::633]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 20:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x633.google.com with SMTP id d22so2074734pll.7 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:35:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:autocrypt:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W2t4UfopMANECAk2zqjxIo1vui/3JVDVpTKmzi7XRSU=; b=p9Uw11b5v8aQXsW7LOLfg7CDAqNPsgQv2plSPKAZYJuh+a1mfNX4yB4Wf01+IPqL03 XrlqjGO+azww3vsZ9LK/ZdZz6SiYCQGFITfP3Y0LTiBkaTDYIsT1fgR9hcVc0k77sSyv g7a0X2QVrXgdd1WBQp2M8lI9/5eeiwkYhKe4vYCzGH7XxCvs3t80HSLA3N4FUQcPCgv4 bV/WX20QTJekHGBjoYok2c/BijZNiOKu6QNZgPUJ795Qk7rFA7SH87hOsp31FHoYAylJ ANZ0EOdoSgBT5Dn2EFlWmvtcBpa+e49P7Xq3VeiGfphAiyH1LlV/6S0F+klcfnrEo90Z DH1w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:autocrypt :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W2t4UfopMANECAk2zqjxIo1vui/3JVDVpTKmzi7XRSU=; b=Oka/AlH4kzc4sXsu/7Nvk85I21jGbfHePPu2LTbX02xX89/OF2lR1kja+gnOixNm4F HXklV0Q2VPJxUiIUUuZYIzhJ4RkvjiXrWq4jk8zyXiAFvisGow8QLjl4C6hJ+fdo6MXA LvPtx/KLPUVSBtIcJJjk/cTttzLYGmQorIA2Rka2hqJSdr/bnNesX/7RGqeiJRiAZ8/3 PNw/QCWQqcGUVZha2gHOm8GPQ3g6PiVjyK9F/5ZCD/Y8Z9EOjbPQ5ejzKtsIGcbO+/ZK bKZU8zoH+kyobM+NsSWtmz5jAdqMLOFOIoP/75RDtKO6PiWRNYirERAmDt5rGqJ6KO89 9ezg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXOz0iOj1DQw3nyamcbdQbGL9Vbvm9x2C7FeRAQw2RTqiWVkgsR K6SCQyh3rmXdnEftaLYu41X41xLJOQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2taiJZNaDxI4/+SootQkBoTtr7OE0SSxBXvnUUT1d3aD0bBXva9OOKFjEEYRnH6vkWduP0w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a84:: with SMTP id w4mr6780405plp.186.1570678540104; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:35:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Stas-Mac.local (ec2-34-209-88-149.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [34.209.88.149]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r185sm5145694pfr.68.2019.10.09.20.35.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:35:39 -0700 (PDT) To: Nikita Popov , Mark Randall Cc: PHP internals References: <5d976928.1c69fb81.db3a8.78daSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> Autocrypt: addr=smalyshev@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsJuBE9mqaARCACFSqcGmNunkjQQu3X+yXnTmFeEkvM4JXZTOBdR8aEevNGmmFEfyvjaDjWi 9hcwp4E/lYtC+P7VsVjM1OSX9eq0jC/lGL0ZyRXek+mNy0n5H1NSuTpf9Y18LMqhc4G+RU+L cNiZ9K0DJuOOvNLPxW7OHZguxb3wdKPXNVa2jyRfJAKm2uaJJMT1mTmFT9a0Q8SKr+mUrrJk uG0H2o6SzrKt8Wwoint1eh67zVsJaJtQFchnEZnlawIcqP2yC4nLGR3MkubowxoEBYCZet18 aHVVRbvpG2Qtob8Lu5xrsGbmXymTkHTdpvkfcJFADa8MzOL90zOxXwbGfbIZOlh5En8jAQCX lfnx2eQL3BSW/6XANa51dbWiEp1d1BAkpGKtZvlk0Qf+M9WAi+9aXMe3xP5krxtgnRNUf2WN 6Zdy2MxL1RRJCFbytLhl0ronC49BsGYVGshdEH8xhBbiIOJKuVZ/DTl9bEm7P9c7CC7iJyVC khUAhouH6xzZQNLR+RU+QebYzXypVfl99Qk7EdMmr/WAZCHLuvanyqepC5EBsa3VnAfQemSN oBeGBKWWLiOsPjvS72+y1z4RUMAfXHn4l/sFMt8zt7/74AmJPwZquV41p4mPO12V4+xPyc6R sB84sfsk2QVivU8w8AkvGQeYjXoz7Iwao95+fWteVzZ36KRQvUckP8pGjHlDXnHxJ0HI1I/k OBZSjwRwUf0dd73y6erPhbLk+gf+NdI3H9KGJBzG5/rVyWKwUeQ9d5ud4jTJRkQGvAP5pg76 vEa9dogbpe4W5Z+0BfbiJSnQmQWSHiZddj/t33ptbup44Ck6ZTgdlmFYMLF1hR47PIZTDKER EuKYGci/vq8snZvEJP9YCw/TtiHcMdrMKcY/+Lp8lQO0GHLPB9glVhnC0db6l1Xpg1CMI8/R ozBMcij30EgATggC/y2zbiqAFoS9FN9nXPbe4phStqABEyeZ+nXudt7PUYTjVgcrqo8bHZCi sBobWC7OnKyUzxVxzUeuPkIfmZuzkLaMw2McQdvwwsNvQ0DzaLP30c1Xsm/7EIYJcOWpzlVJ 5QrdmE0/Bc0yU3RhbmlzbGF2IE1hbHlzaGV2IChQSFAga2V5KSA8c21hbHlzaGV2QGdtYWls LmNvbT7CegQTEQgAIgUCT2aqtAIbAwYLCQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQL3lW vF2gS12XMwD9HuRIolSwIK77u8EY461y2u6sbX36n5/uo/LDQuxoi3sA/0MvpnvzOhv9Iufv vsZEj3E7i3h+iD5648YMwfTFCij+zsFNBE9mqaAQCADfZPMpjZkkGZj3BY/7ApoLq4mwqzbh +CpLXwNn20tFNvSXfb8RdeXvVEb7Scx+W9qYpiaun2iXJgCVH8fgpZpR856ulT1q6uCG++CX ubEvip/eJkZl93/84h04KQJwsgOrAh0Om3OePRn8Pr+++0LNS0EL8uX/YHeTOGOnnmTqYTey SBVFdov6L4mepddfjekicKQqhL7mZh/xuq29JijT0uNNX8v4vDWQDu5dlAcdd+uB3gcXMD/P ginD11zp+6wtrWCm/+yBqpvDwXQX5PGUnwvbRfl7Ay3MmwmoXiecZMg0dwTSc7e0lhB4HGRH ZdBMJB4rHUVGdzqujK/ctOvrAAMFB/0Utb76Qe6sCMlHxVAmeE/fbo7Pi05btZ/x01r67dHf aMSP0riCKJ7M0OW+jAXtu9+z/BVnYisW67WWfxl2cS5tZDgiHgJARXWUOO72+sScHP8KQmTl 1z16gyKbwY3SmyBkwcpOL35nhUWNLy93syPoY6sZUTikr2bZYukHDQ33XBPs4e6MbWKfsa9q aVmnlOF3k5UqChjutfHaEa4Q7VP4wBIpphHBi9MI16oJIzzBPbGl2uoedjwiZ6QeQZnSuOVY ZxU2d3lRA8PrtfFN1VSlpEm/VcAvtieHUYWHN0wOu+cp3Slr5XJVNjTjJhl28SlinMME54mK AGf2Ldr/dRwXwmEEGBEIAAkFAk9mqaACGwwACgkQL3lWvF2gS126EQD/VVd3FgjLKglClRQP zdfU847tqDK4zJjbmRv5vLLwoE0A+wbrQs7jVGU3NrS0AIl5vUmewpp2BKzSkepy23nWmejw Message-ID: <97f3dd0b-da70-e2d3-2e66-d77dea579d80@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 20:35:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Envelope-From: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2) From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > it into some kind of proxy war. Yes, "it breaks backwards compatibility for > questionable benefit" is an argument against this proposal, it is even a > *very good* argument against it, but it's also no mandate to shut down the > discussion entirely. Well, anyone is free to continue the discussion forever and ever (there's no real way of "shutting down" it), but if there a *very good* argument against it, then the point of continuing would be.... ? -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com