Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:107438
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5d976928.1c69fb81.db3a8.78daSMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com>
 <CAF+90c9uXdqJsTizLCca-AswenZDv9-6yw=ranATp3XoutHyxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <DM5PR06MB285747B847DE2D7320758C05DE9A0@DM5PR06MB2857.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <e69fb3de-df5f-f77e-ad4e-61ea30185c5c@lsces.uk> <CAG9XoMR9DhKDwS1moH_9pjDNyZQ70ER5_stNs_GxQFucZ+ar7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <413d377a-4ce1-a521-0cb4-5bb37e84c257@gmail.com> <6DFA91F7-0005-453E-A314-A5DFE1A4D3D3@newclarity.net>
 <CAHN63oN3cgGaaWhYhLUVBAgRsi7d-eLODfhLGBOJetFh98zWQg@mail.gmail.com> <D2050867-9A1B-45D1-A51E-F7AFEE47DD69@newclarity.net>
In-Reply-To: <D2050867-9A1B-45D1-A51E-F7AFEE47DD69@newclarity.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 13:52:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHN63oMg5Bj9y5mfphoVq9KTZ2L5CY9mfTXp6vDGFrgVvtT94Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000050a42605946c597d"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)
From: mo.mu.wss@gmail.com ("M. W. Moe")

--00000000000050a42605946c597d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hello,

I answered you privately about this kind of false assumptions and
projections. (I have an education)

On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 1:38 PM Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net> wrote:

> > a middle ground about/with silliness? there is none, for people in their
> right mind; should people really find/force
> > themselves into conciliation about non-sense? I don't think so and
> mostly; I have no say about deprecating that;
> > but is that a priority? does it harm anyone? someone have died from
> backtick infection, it must be according to some?
> > and so on. Don't see where there is a heated topic; solely a reminder
> about reality and facts.
>
> > What would a happy medium be? backticks working 50% of the time?
> > This is like someone being pregnant, either you are or you are not there
> is
> > no half pregnant. Either backticks work like they have in shells for
> decades
> > or they don't work. What's the point of deprecating them without a plan
> to
> > remove them? A notice without future action is a bad idea, as it sets
> > standard that some deprecation messages will not be acted upon.
>
> Well, those are exactly the opposite of the types of responses I had hoped
> for.
>
> Responses that ignore the concerns of others. Responses that (implicitly?)
> insult the intelligence of others. And responses that can only see things
> from one myopic perspective.
>
> These responses highlight perfectly why discussions on this list are so
> contentious.
>
> -Mike

--00000000000050a42605946c597d--