Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:107251 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 65828 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2019 09:52:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp3.php.net) (208.43.231.12) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2019 09:52:47 -0000 Received: from php-smtp3.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CCB2D2025 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:30:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp3.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:30:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id b2so5380285otq.10 for ; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:30:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=S4FxbymD9pDKSlXDSUTQH6OKHASIIi8LzZ9kSUwWIIA=; b=pYvHNza3GHw9Quvjev0y6ItOKyt9gXsQ3vo4Vlfn9lbu0P/Cpd3QPwRfyKyyc3Scup nqoCCIOE/f8r2xaZu8QyJAmDNfJvV7ZQQTlNpRdHyfRlPa9i0r+rC4mZPUWWfd2HLQVu +1jUCI7KPpTwZIjdqAAeucZlVkdQC8psb3fAAl+jFTe0d87j8Gh2lHsP2hoQ+FcwKanO nAdfZ0XMDscihv9bfdjdVsR90A1TwQcdPIjXsAbmaJF9cHB+aEbUWWB50J8TmQHuDP6g Zg1YpxcWmjBCG6n4gXwGHrA5dPH+Z1RgA/fpY/92tDrjUtxbqeFioDFwazrV0Q7cKkuJ Hhnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S4FxbymD9pDKSlXDSUTQH6OKHASIIi8LzZ9kSUwWIIA=; b=DPnixTpw+fKRQqKoJoev2JRnCqac+95NjDX7h5iJg4nQ8U5zVYua79sPLDutMZo17U WPvt3Y2WsRuNCcclMEwlXasNz1GcLwO6YyDGS/9UP+IEAOsK0sc/JTkBrErbEwjxeljm ZSOGX7GcsN/B6JnjxxROWaYQUCvgXb/7hvvKiYfE9d3SPA5lJbsl1WzoRQmVRuD04OVg zmlkcpdZImoZt7/J4KcP/DVgBfy4Rn/GnB3j4MgQTS+3HDuYLuE3qdA4Ey++TEel8MYR G93nGMYVw0FKZrzPBLGiSE1U8wPcGz3rQNdY1fM9d0fzR4fgCvqSpgfmIZeO5NXRf6Io TL3g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWT2+CAqwVw5uEIaEJivTeWfNWYSZlE62Qz+x6GUUmw6wnj5xl0 UI3qAg4mDQa2BQIBoa9VB9AowlbANMCmiDaCMTi8NiYBF3g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwaVKLr8rNAdpJZpQ8MFwwHmnBmkv0qOAWbRXvKEKNKmIyHMzttzF9suG03ccaXjDKATXcqpm5p+XauU4SqDOQ= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:101:: with SMTP id i1mr4257598otp.233.1568964634600; Fri, 20 Sep 2019 00:30:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 09:30:23 +0200 Message-ID: To: Dan Ackroyd Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b5ed0d0592f70b9b" X-Envelope-From: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Prevent disruptions of conversations From: mtkocak@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Midori_Ko=C3=A7ak?=) --000000000000b5ed0d0592f70b9b Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Wow. A RFC that it's motivation is to prevent beginners from asking questions. That's horrible. I rather prefer a CoC. What about this? https://confcodeofconduct.com/ On Thu, 19 Sep 2019 at 19:19, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > Hi internals, > > Here is an RFC to "Prevent disruptions of conversations" > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/prevent_disruptions_of_conversations?do=edit > > A couple of notes: > > * although the RFC would only be applicable to messages sent once it > might be approved, it would still be nice if people consider how their > messages affect other people before then. > > * any inappropriate messages sent privately to me have a very high > chance of being replied to on the internals list. > > * everyone should bear in mind this RFC might gain more attention from > people outside the PHP internals community than normal. > > * I think this solution isn't going to be a great one, and that it > would be better if we had a less controversial way to address > non-productive behaviour. If someone wants to start a discussion on > replacing this RFC that would be great, but as I said in the RFC in my > opinion this is a needed short term solution. > > cheers > Dan > Ack > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --000000000000b5ed0d0592f70b9b--