Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:107248 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 42314 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2019 08:23:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp3.php.net) (208.43.231.12) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Sep 2019 08:23:01 -0000 Received: from php-smtp3.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D6C2D206B for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 23:00:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp3.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS3215 2.6.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 23:00:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id s1so2082648pgv.8 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 23:00:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:autocrypt:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ducEhw6AnhS0ZeIhV5/bkwg2lI7+9/sA+Cx4TWo/fnI=; b=VljgvWtMqTOsh30le4GijKgXP6J1SBL48T0hO79WyaY7u/ds4LnmUUnjHfKjXsIoun hAXUiWiDgwaWvkBXvXJR+PThSwwZdCOkYic3iEs7MIrYXJcMmfOUOiZMjp5quWXVniCV MODSg4fe6MkludQ3Ul3XHarXfM+Doii9MWTeE30FTt7mIoR6EWCpB97gLaX9Z9KydhY6 p9rkDhNPMM+Gdda/KjJL+XQj2Z0zwLWU7FJWPkXQcIizPksMXzQR2Fv9dFIlBj087c4G Ue1+Lqmgs54Hbetga0U1450GfXPwfXPK1otTBgPoUpUxfk1uKDtZUT4D90phkCxRSZ2h vUYg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:autocrypt:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ducEhw6AnhS0ZeIhV5/bkwg2lI7+9/sA+Cx4TWo/fnI=; b=n1h0a9QpIPvarLGvvASc37nfB0cXIf3ZjXi2Uqp+XqkXBIK2DJbfLoLUPippgbVoBk yRN0G2Kb6d8j/Ujr+J5NNGcpLJW09pRlVW2OLNbT5WhymIVWjRrD8VOTwgi6GSsuPgfq ImE3Dfm8FidOe+Ro0kvdQxPLpYbU3Wm7spm7cLgLHWRqsqo6DSZKLd2p9VYXCWvUvlJD RQF82hM/ggY4atS6WQLJEe/08he6N3DLMOEBSaF0AUMrgOIkWOP9a+h8m2vMffW62gsJ b+DOuTd5bwUdBJjo6wcEaH+TRxw1XVCgN328Z9X7TFKIJtYVkMCT01OhmNcjdjXP+I1u cD+g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXFXb1pnITTVLAbFF85Bi8nPO1dEoQ6wxdnN/FLsMfy8jZ1jcFL CgZt7dCrhtwktWGsugBGeZCi2xAzUA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwnTYD96qhph0cfk9FIAkg6PnJb3DeCr8HORmyi9iS/CdHkhKsL6wvs/3s5FTasLWMsovBujw== X-Received: by 2002:a62:1cf:: with SMTP id 198mr15724564pfb.31.1568959247407; Thu, 19 Sep 2019 23:00:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Stas-Mac.local ([2601:646:8d00:3760:cd47:9f86:8868:6266]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm1215153pfe.1.2019.09.19.23.00.46 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Sep 2019 23:00:46 -0700 (PDT) To: internals@lists.php.net References: Autocrypt: addr=smalyshev@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= xsJuBE9mqaARCACFSqcGmNunkjQQu3X+yXnTmFeEkvM4JXZTOBdR8aEevNGmmFEfyvjaDjWi 9hcwp4E/lYtC+P7VsVjM1OSX9eq0jC/lGL0ZyRXek+mNy0n5H1NSuTpf9Y18LMqhc4G+RU+L cNiZ9K0DJuOOvNLPxW7OHZguxb3wdKPXNVa2jyRfJAKm2uaJJMT1mTmFT9a0Q8SKr+mUrrJk uG0H2o6SzrKt8Wwoint1eh67zVsJaJtQFchnEZnlawIcqP2yC4nLGR3MkubowxoEBYCZet18 aHVVRbvpG2Qtob8Lu5xrsGbmXymTkHTdpvkfcJFADa8MzOL90zOxXwbGfbIZOlh5En8jAQCX lfnx2eQL3BSW/6XANa51dbWiEp1d1BAkpGKtZvlk0Qf+M9WAi+9aXMe3xP5krxtgnRNUf2WN 6Zdy2MxL1RRJCFbytLhl0ronC49BsGYVGshdEH8xhBbiIOJKuVZ/DTl9bEm7P9c7CC7iJyVC khUAhouH6xzZQNLR+RU+QebYzXypVfl99Qk7EdMmr/WAZCHLuvanyqepC5EBsa3VnAfQemSN oBeGBKWWLiOsPjvS72+y1z4RUMAfXHn4l/sFMt8zt7/74AmJPwZquV41p4mPO12V4+xPyc6R sB84sfsk2QVivU8w8AkvGQeYjXoz7Iwao95+fWteVzZ36KRQvUckP8pGjHlDXnHxJ0HI1I/k OBZSjwRwUf0dd73y6erPhbLk+gf+NdI3H9KGJBzG5/rVyWKwUeQ9d5ud4jTJRkQGvAP5pg76 vEa9dogbpe4W5Z+0BfbiJSnQmQWSHiZddj/t33ptbup44Ck6ZTgdlmFYMLF1hR47PIZTDKER EuKYGci/vq8snZvEJP9YCw/TtiHcMdrMKcY/+Lp8lQO0GHLPB9glVhnC0db6l1Xpg1CMI8/R ozBMcij30EgATggC/y2zbiqAFoS9FN9nXPbe4phStqABEyeZ+nXudt7PUYTjVgcrqo8bHZCi sBobWC7OnKyUzxVxzUeuPkIfmZuzkLaMw2McQdvwwsNvQ0DzaLP30c1Xsm/7EIYJcOWpzlVJ 5QrdmE0/Bc0yU3RhbmlzbGF2IE1hbHlzaGV2IChQSFAga2V5KSA8c21hbHlzaGV2QGdtYWls LmNvbT7CegQTEQgAIgUCT2aqtAIbAwYLCQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQL3lW vF2gS12XMwD9HuRIolSwIK77u8EY461y2u6sbX36n5/uo/LDQuxoi3sA/0MvpnvzOhv9Iufv vsZEj3E7i3h+iD5648YMwfTFCij+zsFNBE9mqaAQCADfZPMpjZkkGZj3BY/7ApoLq4mwqzbh +CpLXwNn20tFNvSXfb8RdeXvVEb7Scx+W9qYpiaun2iXJgCVH8fgpZpR856ulT1q6uCG++CX ubEvip/eJkZl93/84h04KQJwsgOrAh0Om3OePRn8Pr+++0LNS0EL8uX/YHeTOGOnnmTqYTey SBVFdov6L4mepddfjekicKQqhL7mZh/xuq29JijT0uNNX8v4vDWQDu5dlAcdd+uB3gcXMD/P ginD11zp+6wtrWCm/+yBqpvDwXQX5PGUnwvbRfl7Ay3MmwmoXiecZMg0dwTSc7e0lhB4HGRH ZdBMJB4rHUVGdzqujK/ctOvrAAMFB/0Utb76Qe6sCMlHxVAmeE/fbo7Pi05btZ/x01r67dHf aMSP0riCKJ7M0OW+jAXtu9+z/BVnYisW67WWfxl2cS5tZDgiHgJARXWUOO72+sScHP8KQmTl 1z16gyKbwY3SmyBkwcpOL35nhUWNLy93syPoY6sZUTikr2bZYukHDQ33XBPs4e6MbWKfsa9q aVmnlOF3k5UqChjutfHaEa4Q7VP4wBIpphHBi9MI16oJIzzBPbGl2uoedjwiZ6QeQZnSuOVY ZxU2d3lRA8PrtfFN1VSlpEm/VcAvtieHUYWHN0wOu+cp3Slr5XJVNjTjJhl28SlinMME54mK AGf2Ldr/dRwXwmEEGBEIAAkFAk9mqaACGwwACgkQL3lWvF2gS126EQD/VVd3FgjLKglClRQP zdfU847tqDK4zJjbmRv5vLLwoE0A+wbrQs7jVGU3NrS0AIl5vUmewpp2BKzSkepy23nWmejw Message-ID: <2145814f-dbf2-9555-138b-4ed51b96522f@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2019 23:00:46 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Envelope-From: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Prevent disruptions of conversations From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev) Hi! > taken part of). So given that track record, along with how the project > philosophy generally is, I do not see abuse being a problem, even the > sligtest. There are a lot of things that I thought our project philosophy does not admit, but turns out I have been wrong. I don't see why if we are already discussing banning people for questioning the holy RFC process, we'd need any "abuse" to have a problem. I think mere "use" of this RFC, as written - to ban people for expressing "wrong" thoughts that somebody (who?) deems "disrupting" - IMO would be abuse enough. And if it's never intended to be used, then why have it? As you yourself mentioned, we've dealt with rare disruptive individuals before it without too much problem and without dramatic speech code RFCs. Clearly, this is meant to go further than that. And that direction is scary to me. -- Stas Malyshev smalyshev@gmail.com