Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:107174 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 86294 invoked from network); 16 Sep 2019 17:40:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp3.php.net) (208.43.231.12) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 16 Sep 2019 17:40:46 -0000 Received: from php-smtp3.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C30C2C0496 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:17:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp3.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS,SPF_HELO_NONE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS16276 188.165.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No Received: from poczta.brzuchalski.com (ns220893.ip-188-165-245.eu [188.165.245.118]) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:17:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by poczta.brzuchalski.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172AE2984236 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:17:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from poczta.brzuchalski.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (poczta.brzuchalski.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eVGZCz5Yd-q4 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-oi1-f171.google.com (unknown [209.85.167.171]) by poczta.brzuchalski.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4E8272984233 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f171.google.com with SMTP id w6so24668oie.11 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:17:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXt5ZOslPXkaL8xrXri5HQda5jPvZZw2LoHSHxc6+UJMSGH5jpq ODrD6d028rL5Bb/K1lV4Xv5Gel/NklsbS+9zr+8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxMpLt6ea0Pcztk88/EBpxZOs6Eb6inGDpqHJff6EECKqumvKlPwGoa+UjVmU6puPk9Vpow4UdizPu8oR27hPk= X-Received: by 2002:aca:5ed4:: with SMTP id s203mr42256oib.101.1568647026340; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:17:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 17:16:54 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Rowan Tommins Cc: PHP Internals List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c877390592ad18fb" X-Envelope-From: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Object Initializer From: michal@brzuchalski.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Brzuchalski?=) --000000000000c877390592ad18fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Rowan, pon., 16 wrz 2019 o 16:57 Rowan Tommins napisa=C5=82(a): > > >> >>> >>> That would require multiple new features, though, so initializers might >>> be >>> more achievable in the short term, and perhaps there is room for both, >>> particularly if support for getters and setters improves. >>> >>> >> Here again, IIRC you're trying to solve the issue which is off-topic. >> Improving protected and private properties initialization through >> constructor is not the main target of current RFC. >> > > > > I don't think it's off-topic to consider whether a related feature would > make this one redundant. However, you've picked a weird sentence to reply > to, because I'm agreeing with you, that the two features could exist side > by side without being redundant. > Sorry for that, the quoted sentence was left unintentionally and yes, it's not off-topic. Had to rethink what I was trying to say, but I do think both these features could exist. Regards, Micha=C5=82 Brzuchalski --000000000000c877390592ad18fb--