Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:107126
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOwTYAu5vCGMw4Dp0v90fGD9OGm6X0dc42iJV35bk1Df_yr_2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <3cb49f31-34c1-3c81-3bc4-5cf3b6f52d99@gmail.com> <CAAwbVudwmCYFeFg7Hp7bAGgnToOLoERN_TJChAYk8hir7AHweQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAwbVudwmCYFeFg7Hp7bAGgnToOLoERN_TJChAYk8hir7AHweQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2019 23:41:28 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAwbVuf5KwJzLk=FYeO7cBZO74CnmtouA17cuvmVS0gz6_U-Ww@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e722e305929f30ee"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Defining the PHP Group
From: oludonsexy@gmail.com (Olumide Samson)

--000000000000e722e305929f30ee
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 11:41 PM Olumide Samson <oludonsexy@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2019, 8:33 PM Stanislav Malyshev <smalyshev@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> > Does anyone object to any of those words ?
>>
>> Yes. I do not think precommitting to implement anything that has been
>> put on wiki and passed the vote is a good thing. Its a good conflict
>> resolution mechanism when we're talking about where or not to implement
>> certain technical feature. But IMO it would be terrible as a sole
>> governance mechanism for the whole project.
>>
>> > Do we need to vote on changing the introduction (I'm happy to start an
>> rfc
>> > for this, if necessary) ?
>>
>> I don't think RFCs were meant to essentially remake all project
>> governance structure.
>
>
> Hi Stanislav, I would expect you to reply with what can be done, not
> saying the RFC is not meant to do this and that, my common sense is telling
> me you are either deliberately omitting some details on what the process
> would be, if not the RFC.
>
> Everyone else - what was the process that brought about the RFC?
>
> If its mails through the mailing list(that brought about the RFC), then
> mails with majority agreed on signify the changes required to change the
> RFC itself.
>
> I don't like it when people say parliament was created by constitution yet
> the parliament can't still change constitution; then what else can change
> the constitution, maybe voice vote?
>
> The RFC was created years ago and IMO can't be there forever, so what
> would change it? The RFC itself recently changed some scope of itself.
>
> GCC would call this bootstrapping
>
> They were meant for solving technical questions,
>> not governance model.
>> I am not sure which way would be the best (haven't thought about it) but
>> certainly neither just putting some words on wiki nor voting on it
>> within the RFC process looks like a good way to do it.
>>
>> --
>> Stas Malyshev
>> smalyshev@gmail.com
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>>

--000000000000e722e305929f30ee--