Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106960
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF+90c9Kc6m_bv=aJxbD3-RmnNXXLqv6mPjHp7U7qxX_ck27qw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c_KHYm1SLOKkZXM6xurYiDTX3=hbijpD8rT1OSUHSod_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CEC35EF9-9956-44BE-8C8E-EE5FC3D5A7C7@gmail.com> <D5DDA318-E953-4AB8-873F-7CA7264722E2@koalephant.com>
 <E30D9A22-9842-4A67-ABA5-A339875FFE12@gmail.com> <CAG9XoMTG3OLbD0BfWv+ORUUsbMV2CaF0Ea4NLF1huHBr5JCmWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALKiJKrftDt1ohJQLrgx+n57nf-TMVpUKYRVKWBkCa-ND1LVMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6s+C07KABQcZ9x+vgH8pYdVcGZcx6m8Dg+E+LYn1RgOLoA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0xaBHHv0xt=-Fxb9ku945eDFZ_6BXWhmFoqiZhqKzr903m-g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL0xaBHHv0xt=-Fxb9ku945eDFZ_6BXWhmFoqiZhqKzr903m-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:25:35 +0200
Message-ID: <CADyq6sK5UCcLW16osiXshTgz0XUqNFZ9dOnf1pG2FCXJJerROQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arvids Godjuks <arvids.godjuks@gmail.com>
Cc: Rowan Tommins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f10c8205925be929"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Reclassifying engine warnings
From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta)

--000000000000f10c8205925be929
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 <http://ocramius.github.com/>


On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:02 PM Arvids Godjuks <arvids.godjuks@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> =D1=87=D1=82, 12 =D1=81=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=82. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 15:33, Mar=
co Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hey Rowan,
>> <http://ocramius.github.com/>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 3:30 PM Rowan Tommins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > For instance, for undefined array keys, what if we had an operator for
>> > "initialise and retrieve", such as $foo[? 'bar']. Then we could simpli=
fy
>> > ugly code like this:
>> >
>> > if ( ! isset($foo[$key1]) {
>> >    $foo[$key1] =3D [];
>> > }
>> > if ( ! isset($foo[$key1][$key2]) {
>> >    $foo[$key1][$key2] =3D 0;
>> > }
>> > $foo[$key1][$key2]++;
>> >
>> >
>> > With something safe but succinct like this:
>> >
>> > $foo[? $key1][? $key2]++;
>> >
>>
>> $foo[$key1][$key2] =3D ($foo[$key1][$key2] ?? 0) + 1;
>>
>>
>>
> This message contains a healthy dose of sarcasm.
>
>
No sarcasm intended: question is about the verbosity and length of a
*proper* (correct =3D no warnings/notices/errors, matches type expectations=
)
checked solution, and I provided a simple one-liner that is both readable
and correct.

You can make what you want out of this, but there was most certainly no
sarcasm.

Marco Pivetta

http://twitter.com/Ocramius

http://ocramius.github.com/

--000000000000f10c8205925be929--