Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106923 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64983 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2019 10:28:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO php-smtp3.php.net) (208.43.231.12) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 10 Sep 2019 10:28:02 -0000 Received: from php-smtp3.php.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9704E2D1FDE for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 01:03:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on php-smtp3.php.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-ASN: AS12876 195.154.0.0/16 X-Spam-Virus: No Received: from smtp.opensides.be (smtp.opensides.be [195.154.20.141]) by php-smtp3.php.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 01:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.opensides.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A302AFBEFE for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:02:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at opensides.be Received: from smtp.opensides.be ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.opensides.be [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 6AyVvvFPmdu1 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:02:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mcmic-probook.opensides.be (63.120.199.77.rev.sfr.net [77.199.120.63]) by smtp.opensides.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C924FBEF6 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:02:46 +0200 (CEST) To: internals@lists.php.net Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:02:45 +0200 Message-ID: <224016946.qxTngThDFd@mcmic-probook> Organization: OpenSides User-Agent: KMail/5.2.3 (Linux/4.9.0-9-amd64; KDE/5.28.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <2157489.0uZv62oTo4@mcmic-probook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Envelope-From: Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Union Types v2 (followup on github usage) From: come@opensides.be (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=F4me?= Chilliet) Le vendredi 6 septembre 2019, 16:47:52 CEST Nikita Popov a =E9crit : > * GitHub would not be the exclusive venue for RFC discussion. All RFCs a= re > still announced on internals and the top-level discussion can and should > still happen here. My remark on the mailing list regarding string|true was unanswered and I ha= d to go over to github to see that the concern was discussed there. This is the kind of problems splitting the discussion will cause, people wi= ll have to check both places or miss things. Regarding the github PR as a practical point of view, I find it hard to che= ck if there are new messages since last time I visited the page. Is there a= ny way to browse messages by time? (backwards ideally). C=F4me