Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106664 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77691 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2019 17:48:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qk1-f174.google.com) (209.85.222.174) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2019 17:48:32 -0000 Received: by mail-qk1-f174.google.com with SMTP id u190so4800415qkh.5 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:18:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=t/ArszhuEL22eBEAbpi/AaiseCWEednpuqyqCzhCByE=; b=KNgELwB2XOP8f8n2bq/X+HxTqEuktGTZVHeAsniHOnhdM8FHi1XTruD0y+lERLCZjF BC498itqHIxm1Q7f5Epgb2oGqTketZHPFeGyRTo57vlgP8qzqMQpmife90z5Pz0WxlNp l4Am8nBduUhKm0pzmaYuOt3EfJYEiqv7XhebtE1/72bcL05Vb2K67JpU123bgqtSxK7I +wOm9bu8Oz24oGy9gB0E/wnAawojl92oNN7UY4RjFGcW5fdLNtNZQy0uHH4DRM8SilHR U0iqQ3g+c9Axb/tHpogDJQP24quL4zixfgild2czU33q8+YzJty6MSfUKVv+cfJZPWUD 0+BQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUXqhthcXyWdu+cYqTSa9BG34ocUUbU8TJTcw+Mnu3LZKNhCdpi zaCqinzGaayu+SmRKPtD1NI6B6K5kJnrTI7zjMkPdg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxo4098Q0L638Nn6wPu1FIJ8MtmnVg9cFF2y+bLvzlYOzuPDHBTjb7/j3ZAp7ro42HlbPI5AHWEg+BFXuZt7c4= X-Received: by 2002:a37:5f87:: with SMTP id t129mr8315582qkb.183.1566314322394; Tue, 20 Aug 2019 08:18:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <000001d54e5a$02ac09f0$08041dd0$@roze.lv> <2b5588d6-d667-321f-22f1-46a22bb797c5@korulczyk.pl> <000001d54ea3$eb3480a0$c19d81e0$@roze.lv> <000301d54ead$b43e7b00$1cbb7100$@roze.lv> <59378662-77ca-0779-10cb-c25acf1b45ef@korulczyk.pl> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 10:18:31 -0500 Message-ID: To: "G. P. B." Cc: PHP internals list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cb137205908df8c1" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Deprecate PHP's short open tags, again From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) --000000000000cb137205908df8c1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 7:51 AM G. P. B. wrote: > - I seriously don't appreciate that the RFC has been edited *WITHOUT* my > knowledge to add endorsement names on the counterargument to the RFC on the > RFC itself when the appropriate place would have been the counter argument > document. > > This has been a topic of discussion in the past. The agreement was that non-author edits are permitted if they are isolated to a clear "counter-arguments" section. If someone had changed the meaning of the RFC or of your arguments in favor of it that would be another story, but that's not what happened here. -Sara --000000000000cb137205908df8c1--