Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106608
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 18:54:10 +0300
To: Derick Rethans <derick@php.net>, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>
Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
Message-ID: <a327264d-b098-4da6-a88c-44f2e2ebaa04@Spark>
In-Reply-To: <CAESVnVo94dSgU7vf62aPO409cGU_WMFrw4FV-ABFiKiMKjWs1A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908141608160.29731@singlemalt.home.derickrethans.nl>
 <CAESVnVo94dSgU7vf62aPO409cGU_WMFrw4FV-ABFiKiMKjWs1A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="5d542eab_3f2dba31_66e6"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Vote: Straw poll for P++ feasibility
From: sergey@s-panteleev.ru

--5d542eab_3f2dba31_66e6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi=21

my 2c:

As I understood, Zeev said about two camps: ones want to make PHP more st=
rict, others =E2=80=93 not.

Maybe, is more productive to discuss the general direction of PHP (it wil=
l be a strict road or not) instead of 4 months=C2=A0disputes=C2=A0about s=
hort open tags, or sisters language or other derivative things=3F

IMHO, if there is a single direction, many disputes will disappear by the=
mselves

=E2=80=94
Sincerely,
Sergey Panteleev
Telegram: =40saundefined
E-mail: sergey=40s-panteleev.ru
On 14 Aug 2019, 18:27 +0300, Sara Golemon <pollita=40php.net>, wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:14 AM Derick Rethans <derick=40php.net> wrot=
e:
>
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/p-plus-plus
> >
> > To follow up my no vote; What I'm against is splitting the language o=
n
> hard boundaries that never disappear, only widen. I'm also a 'No' on
> Editions, but slightly less of a 'No', and possibly a 'Yes', if those
> editions are clearly intended to fade over time.
>
> -Sara

--5d542eab_3f2dba31_66e6--