Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106435 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35039 invoked from network); 8 Aug 2019 15:14:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zeona.lv) (213.175.74.1) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 8 Aug 2019 15:14:30 -0000 Received: from MezhRoze (unknown [10.8.0.69]) by zeona.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D202009DAB7 for ; Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:41:38 +0300 (EEST) To: References: <1759114.DMe9nKvMbn@mcmic-probook> <62c73b8f-df41-43c2-bb51-ceeaf607cacf@Spark> In-Reply-To: <62c73b8f-df41-43c2-bb51-ceeaf607cacf@Spark> Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2019 15:41:39 +0300 Message-ID: <000801d54de6$a01909f0$e04b1dd0$@roze.lv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQHjzwR+XvJt6M7mF5GjTobLDXnEoQHFZEocAaJPs6MBnySGFgHPcNMwpp17N1A= Content-Language: lv Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Deprecate PHP's short open tags, again From: r@roze.lv ("Reinis Rozitis") > -----Original Message----- > From: Brent [mailto:brendt@stitcher.io] > > > It feels like much of the counter arguments are based on guesses = without any > real data to point to. It goes both ways - the argument for removal states "This means that = their use is not possible in portable code, because the code author does = not necessarily have the necessary control over the configuration". What is the number/statistics of developers which have written a = portable (in their mind) code (which means NOT using short tags) just to = find out that the code/application doesn't work because those are = disabled? Is there real data for that? rr=20