Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106393 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9686 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2019 19:53:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-vs1-f49.google.com) (209.85.217.49) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 6 Aug 2019 19:53:10 -0000 Received: by mail-vs1-f49.google.com with SMTP id m8so58891446vsj.0 for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 10:19:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IxwiZj5d+9TEfIXPy2m3dHooQUFmDABJNOuVllRZQDY=; b=h658RtqsI4772ZvRwwh/vCSAXYe5UWlRTjkl1RydcOFWIB+Usw/yBlr6ZyVproqUfN ytnHXt0qAaKxjGGesPHWmgwyc6DBPvznPIH9HVFsQZ43tFuwFBvD3yuUPJ5F5t/4LjEO mSk9DU3rx3JouAR77DTu5C0xkDTDQY/Ekf+cy+UlGo1z5Uhjjd5Cn9A1OHgFp9sthFU9 DTmqvjmLhiGPh7cAvDG0OERlXi6FiHHIib+Mf6IxZOFIcR+ChEEEkWyW8B6Bu85QfKCV kEcuE2WAd/spFuebcWe3+rY3JaqHTSY817O8B59RnvwmMxLCYHKpBC0fHvPCivbNfUUd ioCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IxwiZj5d+9TEfIXPy2m3dHooQUFmDABJNOuVllRZQDY=; b=D7viYTtBKyWV1Vra7x3DwYDYD8VpXaYF33KS5myovJKns/xRKspBrL3J3p2SeIJrNQ AQOxTV7a9O2cbokc+STODFHeE3r+w+T3yMFoPR4yoYttC4PQpJAdHOrI/WHipGUbZWRR qltyy8AMg3gk18iZau5oIrelNrq9v06hjd7yCAi7JYbH1gg4XZTkvbY6bgslSZvlWRiM 87xEEZymjxRYJbiamC2+1nt7EDkkYs/bBAX3+CF/lGg3dmsRNY1XUeBhr1yjUSjKGq0C I8DiU+8h9VlfgP511I/qP48+MWyFoBt4tr/QMdaYPyEqqB9pOBdl6ebx7O9vSRY1J7R7 3bcg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWqaq8G/3gX6eFjj+/xAQILjhweOrHXBePrV3XeHGJUC8SeF2ds 2P6/IihR0t3vBQa0kvuQmsL8mR8+C71mNFki3Xo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzmTmrpFnmHJaYZ/3w9CAOrTTn/FmjkXBFRPl0cPah+dNVvDBcU1Z0P5yuNpjsTg2zPtMWulA5ZJ9UG7kULEFo= X-Received: by 2002:a67:da99:: with SMTP id w25mr3195684vsj.141.1565111991445; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 10:19:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 19:19:39 +0200 Message-ID: To: Rowan Collins , chasepeeler@gmail.com Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000048aae6058f76081f" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Deprecate PHP's short open tags, again From: george.banyard@gmail.com ("G. P. B.") --00000000000048aae6058f76081f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 19:12, Rowan Collins wrote: > On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 17:59, Chase Peeler wrote: > > > I'm not a voter, but, I have a question. If this fails, does that mean > the > > original RFC that passed is still in effect? > > > > > Yes, this is really ambiguous, and risks the situation being even more > confusing than it was before. > > The "No" column on this RFC already includes people who voted "Yes" on the > previous version; is this an indication that they have changed their mind > about removing short tags, or that they prefer the original proposal? > > I think we urgently need to clarify this, and may need to reset the vote > with one or more clearer questions. > > Regards, > -- > Rowan Collins > [IMSoP] This RFC supersedes the previous one as stated in the the RFC itself : " This RFC supersedes the previous one and proposes a different deprecation approach." meaning that the previous one is void. I don't know why this is ambiguous and needs to be said once again. Best regards George P. Banyard --00000000000048aae6058f76081f--