Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106392
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFPFaML19B_RehrUQLEy_oFae-H5r3+BpUGg=GF1js83cJpJqQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPKYkKxHkQojFnCs09htRFvTrV_SReQV7YVo6RxRSmuN9H_Q0w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPKYkKxHkQojFnCs09htRFvTrV_SReQV7YVo6RxRSmuN9H_Q0w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 18:11:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CALKiJKrXatW9Va0bjsUQD+TCCge=HcMzyV8Uf+rq+_s9xoyyuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007a9679058f75ec91"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Deprecate PHP's short open tags, again
From: rowan.collins@gmail.com (Rowan Collins)

--0000000000007a9679058f75ec91
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 17:59, Chase Peeler <chasepeeler@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not a voter, but, I have a question. If this fails, does that mean the
> original RFC that passed is still in effect?
>


Yes, this is really ambiguous, and risks the situation being even more
confusing than it was before.

The "No" column on this RFC already includes people who voted "Yes" on the
previous version; is this an indication that they have changed their mind
about removing short tags, or that they prefer the original proposal?

I think we urgently need to clarify this, and may need to reset the vote
with one or more clearer questions.

Regards,
-- 
Rowan Collins
[IMSoP]

--0000000000007a9679058f75ec91--