Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106383
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAFPFaMLpZ=okschrpeH77AhZTHcvFBuPf1S1bXH6psxmvABK7g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJHtznwZ_oPA5vWds6mCYAUSiyCrvLrUWSAUj7pV9DeU2Zzp1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFPFaM+OT67UiD8uo08iXc-LZRUgs1wFF+ZaW7XdycT-OMagTQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJHtznxNDhOMLGJAa7yTrbSpK8=zM++BHgiqy-wmKPpqd_AXAw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJHtznxNDhOMLGJAa7yTrbSpK8=zM++BHgiqy-wmKPpqd_AXAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 11:26:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPg3XxJ5=HYUW2FA-Ds9S4rcYgxnttsKAFmb-0uOzY9Y2XaxeA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zeev Suraski <zeev@php.net>
Cc: "G. P. B." <george.banyard@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000780f2f058f703ef8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Counterargument to Short Tags Deprecation (was: Re:
 [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [DISCUSSION] Deprecate PHP's short open tags V2)
From: petercowburn@gmail.com (Peter Cowburn)

--000000000000780f2f058f703ef8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 23:51, Zeev Suraski <zeev@php.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:05 PM G. P. B. <george.banyard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > I'd prefer Dan's approach and having a seperate page linked at the top of
> > the RFC.
> >
> > I'll start voting tomorrow and will link to your page in the same message
> > as the voting announcement.
> >
>
> Thanks George.  I created a page with a counterargument to the deprecation
> proposal here:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/counterargument/deprecate_php_short_tags and
> linked it from the RFC.
>
> If others have additional input to add there, please let me know.
>

Please keep this sort of content inside the relevant mailing list thread,
we don't need yet more places to go hunting for comments on RFCs.  I'm not
sure what the value is of a dedicated wiki page is (for context, I have
read Dan's thread suggesting the idea), other than to have a new soap box
to shout from for the most loud voices.  Key feedback to RFCs should at
minimum appear in the respective discussion thread on the list.  If it
does, then this page is redundant.  If it doesn't, then it should.


>
> Zeev
>

--000000000000780f2f058f703ef8--