Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106244
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <8442f1fa5544b2ca03e7cebbc64e8e5c@wkhudgins.info>
 <EECABEB0-D1E5-4438-A061-477C9BEDC024@simon.geek.nz> <eab667bf34e12ee2ad8b6bedabf66cc2@wkhudgins.info>
 <B6702192-0F94-4676-9B44-0DADD0E65060@simon.geek.nz> <683c5da474e13283030cac3d0c0ec080@wkhudgins.info>
 <2c37999d1e5372ae6ab48bfce5420796@wkhudgins.info> <CAF+90c-YBYSQGkmwS0qa68fpAcQxef_7SGa6LRkavamiwLtpRA@mail.gmail.com>
 <2CF672F8-12F5-4D37-8B8C-591A6E695220@benramsey.com> <78034520cdb610d923e25d47ed718938@wkhudgins.info>
 <CAF+90c_RkYUfvMtkwYhB2wy1uKfakAJxk4hjM2yLhNxt56L3UQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <000a01d52e91$2a4b6f20$7ee24d60$@jhdxr.com> <93528f103c149b7c48e8f35914049d06@wkhudgins.info>
 <97884add-88fd-e09e-92c6-2c1b68c579f5@xs4all.nl> <22ac19ecaf897370facfe9fd0a8b1993@wkhudgins.info>
 <0f8ab2d1-c308-7168-0aba-a5bcf327c3ad@telia.com> <4d340e64db8d81f47cd7e4f7d3a4c268@wkhudgins.info>
In-Reply-To: <4d340e64db8d81f47cd7e4f7d3a4c268@wkhudgins.info>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:53:43 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF+90c-6wMdoGqX1841UvQbwyNK2mgfGRJ7dGEDp1nNboHzm8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: will@wkhudgins.info
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000885fd8058e413793"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Voting opens for str_starts_with and ends_with functions
From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov)

--000000000000885fd8058e413793
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Fri, Jul 5, 2019 at 4:13 AM <will@wkhudgins.info> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> After 15 days of discussion I have opened up voting on the following RFC
> (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_str_begin_and_end_functions) .
>
> You can access the voting page here:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_str_begin_and_end_functions/vote
>
> I have never set up a vote on doku-wiki so please let me know if I made
> the vote incorrectly!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>

As we're already two days past the announced end, I've closed the RFC vote.
The final outcome is 26 in favor vs 20 against for str_starts_with and
friends, and 4 in favor to 36 against for mb_starts_with and friends.
Because a 2/3 majority is required, both parts of the proposal are declined.

Based on the discussion during voting, I think that trying this again with
just str_starts_with+str_ends_with without the case-insensitive variants
might pass, as that's where the main controversy seems to be -- though some
people also expressed the view that these functions are too trivial to add
to the standard library.

In any case, thanks for driving this through the RFC process!

Nikita

--000000000000885fd8058e413793--