Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106197
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CANZOY=Dn-fJGG2FRjBjFB1joMgLKtvxpPetEb64RMN5NHfku_w@mail.gmail.com>
 <009e01d53625$afb06300$0f112900$@jhdxr.com>
In-Reply-To: <009e01d53625$afb06300$0f112900$@jhdxr.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:12:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAF+90c9tg+ouhx2YMo65BQuidUQu0bfEsykbiyCxYWZENVpGAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: CHU Zhaowei <me@jhdxr.com>
Cc: Arnold Daniels <arnold.adaniels.nl@gmail.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008708f3058d3ccd5f"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Strict operators directive
From: nikita.ppv@gmail.com (Nikita Popov)

--0000000000008708f3058d3ccd5f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 9:19 AM CHU Zhaowei <me@jhdxr.com> wrote:

> Although I like this idea, I'm wondering if such a big change should go
> for php 8 instead of 7.4.
>
> Regards,

CHU Zhaowei
>

Right. I really wouldn't want to merge this kind of large change on the
very day of feature freeze. I would feel a lot better about this if it
targeted PHP 8 and the vote was in one month, when we're not scrambling to
finalize 7.4 features...

Nikita


> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Arnold Daniels <arnold.adaniels.nl@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 9:56 AM
> > To: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
> > Subject: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Strict operators directive
> >
> > Hi internals,
> >
> > I've opened voting on the strict operators directive:
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/strict_operators
> >
> > As promised, a patch and tests have been prepared. This is available on
> > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/4375
> >
> > Regards,
> > Arnold
>
>
>
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--0000000000008708f3058d3ccd5f--