Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:106034
Return-Path: <smalyshev@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 62760 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2019 22:22:51 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-pg1-f169.google.com) (209.85.215.169)
by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2019 22:22:51 -0000
Received: by mail-pg1-f169.google.com with SMTP id v9so4936840pgr.13
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:38:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt:message-id:date
:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=cVtn/E/+cmSJkbI0H6ly155IYP/IZEsH2KycX500/yU=;
b=KZa9ud78k/aWXyasfpHrjW5uKctgCaSIXSf3myBDr6JPwObLtFfrQlf5e32Z/wyNKZ
7Qw5q6BN5wZVA+2z/HZCGfv8T0P1cphErmMLcJqlpVlPpGrwMSLIwtf5cg1vWQzkDi8V
CuDa4WWIpgzBze9vkitTjFeuBPm2DFhh8CTmWpEIzE2JWjFAiUeQqBeyJn1V/w8NnP0D
jLjuSrPVmHzi7dpxVRRSMY+6VINN3M86Tf0h4TVyjkEKtXQauf15v6vJRQ0+xYnacJNr
kj3ao3JT7dIB0HSZELULEFHSMndrp/JAxF2PJtXK3PrXwmftLCPulOndoZec+nuJL/Xc
XmSg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:openpgp:autocrypt
:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to
:content-language:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=cVtn/E/+cmSJkbI0H6ly155IYP/IZEsH2KycX500/yU=;
b=LYFgi3NBpetq8kn/HYUFC8IhYFfCkPC/5nnsdffmKN4Mm0wlgOSrzur6Hjfw3nTAJP
EvkfmIdl45RRnVeQVosDeEHSiriCQ9wQQ7kJf3/wdNiGI6KnuiV6zIHC0G6WkK36vJfx
rOekPfJA55jferAbXeTR34mNuzzwO1Spo03qPqplX8gJARg5gnBX0jYIVSkwfrRSUm0+
+x6ZiroD9E8CJ9wt0+5WtGL2yyJQnTp/9z0n0wZ7uE3E0rbroOSDxkO6GdfM9TPzEoIW
TsAKHqV4736AJs9O2EiTuQNtJdAWA9rf9TaJmNR2DcuAF0RSW1bzJ0fmOjEEPx1keazt
QHXA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWDrFfhkmAmRhLZczGMSXKsP0FD00u8zyOtgnxbYi+4DHZRG1pn
ffdd2TsSzvfsVlt6BEvNsg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx9lNwKOm3ouwt/Fcz1Fs8fzikm4sZ8yE601prt8GzKjtr1FQdv2zFHzPlUWIJ+jqt//8DcmA==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6097:: with SMTP id z23mr14734250pji.75.1561232298961;
Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Stas-Pro-2016.lan (c-24-4-176-254.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [24.4.176.254])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c9sm7080765pfn.3.2019.06.22.12.38.17
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:38:18 -0700 (PDT)
To: Joe Watkins <krakjoe@gmail.com>, Kalle Sommer Nielsen <kalle@php.net>
Cc: Internals <internals@lists.php.net>, Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
References: <CAJW__o0GLjcagzF0ZpEK54yyhkFpgV6tm4p+ihnZvv-dC3YFUQ@mail.gmail.com>
<09a8bba3-d17a-a8e5-f9b7-cc3d65f1e66c@gmail.com>
<CAJW__o1pFnhtvyX5prNFV--PWNdb3deopwky1aRzY-bPuuA9bQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAOwTYAtMhNw2-n7X_NUEXOY0UR2m7ijUVbS28Uy4S+i1hS4fXw@mail.gmail.com>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
Autocrypt: addr=smalyshev@gmail.com; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata=
mQMuBE9mqaARCACFSqcGmNunkjQQu3X+yXnTmFeEkvM4JXZTOBdR8aEevNGmmFEfyvjaDjWi
9hcwp4E/lYtC+P7VsVjM1OSX9eq0jC/lGL0ZyRXek+mNy0n5H1NSuTpf9Y18LMqhc4G+RU+L
cNiZ9K0DJuOOvNLPxW7OHZguxb3wdKPXNVa2jyRfJAKm2uaJJMT1mTmFT9a0Q8SKr+mUrrJk
uG0H2o6SzrKt8Wwoint1eh67zVsJaJtQFchnEZnlawIcqP2yC4nLGR3MkubowxoEBYCZet18
aHVVRbvpG2Qtob8Lu5xrsGbmXymTkHTdpvkfcJFADa8MzOL90zOxXwbGfbIZOlh5En8jAQCX
lfnx2eQL3BSW/6XANa51dbWiEp1d1BAkpGKtZvlk0Qf+M9WAi+9aXMe3xP5krxtgnRNUf2WN
6Zdy2MxL1RRJCFbytLhl0ronC49BsGYVGshdEH8xhBbiIOJKuVZ/DTl9bEm7P9c7CC7iJyVC
khUAhouH6xzZQNLR+RU+QebYzXypVfl99Qk7EdMmr/WAZCHLuvanyqepC5EBsa3VnAfQemSN
oBeGBKWWLiOsPjvS72+y1z4RUMAfXHn4l/sFMt8zt7/74AmJPwZquV41p4mPO12V4+xPyc6R
sB84sfsk2QVivU8w8AkvGQeYjXoz7Iwao95+fWteVzZ36KRQvUckP8pGjHlDXnHxJ0HI1I/k
OBZSjwRwUf0dd73y6erPhbLk+gf+NdI3H9KGJBzG5/rVyWKwUeQ9d5ud4jTJRkQGvAP5pg76
vEa9dogbpe4W5Z+0BfbiJSnQmQWSHiZddj/t33ptbup44Ck6ZTgdlmFYMLF1hR47PIZTDKER
EuKYGci/vq8snZvEJP9YCw/TtiHcMdrMKcY/+Lp8lQO0GHLPB9glVhnC0db6l1Xpg1CMI8/R
ozBMcij30EgATggC/y2zbiqAFoS9FN9nXPbe4phStqABEyeZ+nXudt7PUYTjVgcrqo8bHZCi
sBobWC7OnKyUzxVxzUeuPkIfmZuzkLaMw2McQdvwwsNvQ0DzaLP30c1Xsm/7EIYJcOWpzlVJ
5QrdmE0/BbQyU3RhbmlzbGF2IE1hbHlzaGV2IChQSFAga2V5KSA8c21hbHlzaGV2QGdtYWls
LmNvbT6IegQTEQgAIgUCT2aqtAIbAwYLCQgHAwIGFQgCCQoLBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQL3lW
vF2gS12XMwD9HuRIolSwIK77u8EY461y2u6sbX36n5/uo/LDQuxoi3sA/0MvpnvzOhv9Iufv
vsZEj3E7i3h+iD5648YMwfTFCij+uQINBE9mqaAQCADfZPMpjZkkGZj3BY/7ApoLq4mwqzbh
+CpLXwNn20tFNvSXfb8RdeXvVEb7Scx+W9qYpiaun2iXJgCVH8fgpZpR856ulT1q6uCG++CX
ubEvip/eJkZl93/84h04KQJwsgOrAh0Om3OePRn8Pr+++0LNS0EL8uX/YHeTOGOnnmTqYTey
SBVFdov6L4mepddfjekicKQqhL7mZh/xuq29JijT0uNNX8v4vDWQDu5dlAcdd+uB3gcXMD/P
ginD11zp+6wtrWCm/+yBqpvDwXQX5PGUnwvbRfl7Ay3MmwmoXiecZMg0dwTSc7e0lhB4HGRH
ZdBMJB4rHUVGdzqujK/ctOvrAAMFB/0Utb76Qe6sCMlHxVAmeE/fbo7Pi05btZ/x01r67dHf
aMSP0riCKJ7M0OW+jAXtu9+z/BVnYisW67WWfxl2cS5tZDgiHgJARXWUOO72+sScHP8KQmTl
1z16gyKbwY3SmyBkwcpOL35nhUWNLy93syPoY6sZUTikr2bZYukHDQ33XBPs4e6MbWKfsa9q
aVmnlOF3k5UqChjutfHaEa4Q7VP4wBIpphHBi9MI16oJIzzBPbGl2uoedjwiZ6QeQZnSuOVY
ZxU2d3lRA8PrtfFN1VSlpEm/VcAvtieHUYWHN0wOu+cp3Slr5XJVNjTjJhl28SlinMME54mK
AGf2Ldr/dRwXiGEEGBEIAAkFAk9mqaACGwwACgkQL3lWvF2gS126EQD/VVd3FgjLKglClRQP
zdfU847tqDK4zJjbmRv5vLLwoE0A+wbrQs7jVGU3NrS0AIl5vUmewpp2BKzSkepy23nWmejw
Message-ID: <a30ee70f-0c02-5e06-0301-2eb03320d304@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:38:17 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0)
Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOwTYAtMhNw2-n7X_NUEXOY0UR2m7ijUVbS28Uy4S+i1hS4fXw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecations for 7.4
From: smalyshev@gmail.com (Stanislav Malyshev)
Hi!
> In general, something is considered a primary vote if it could be
> conducted independently of other primary votes in the same RFC - ie, it
> is not an implementation detail.
>
> So, what we have here is multiple primary votes ...
I am not talking bureaucracy here, I'm talking about discussion on the
merits. It is virtually impossible to discuss 20 proposals on the merits
within a single thread. Of course, in this RFC there are not 20
different proposals - most of it is of the same type, deprecating
certain function, usually for the same reason (which I coincidentally
believer is wrong, but that's for another thread).
However, some of these are of a different types, and I think they'd be
better as separate RFCs. Especially the allow_url_include thing and
closure $this thing (which I'm not sure even needs an RFC if I
understand the argument right - we pretty much have no choice there).
Discussing them all together would be messy.
--
Stas Malyshev
smalyshev@gmail.com