Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:105948
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOv67gumG=mdj1Nr=uXtRTSdxGOMEu8=TZizdpgf5AsoaRVGDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CADyq6sJX+cAfUrMiGA3_9drMS=+fCVvySNroy0BfNF1VcRxwFg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOv67gtUm5_6dbh6G25hC7DeNSCsL7VrGqX8JVp3Uu+a=JN-GQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJW__o3Qf5_ePp-o7abJ72UPKVAUSVhtusKxyJgFG=emx_q16g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOv67gv-frMK5Pv3qOocb+ncbmJ1o45QB-E9SF1y_x8pSuZaGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJW__o1wRSn+ruAWS=UjJ3AKdtcrBTeju-oSuo3Je3VE7JLc-Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHN63oM3FN4T149cMaiNqCLWH88gq0NMP_m+TxtGUcA_bvWOwQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOv67guT=WzkQ8EyMwWCzEkVn08cnyFBWS+itMnDJ1zosBQDGw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOv67guT=WzkQ8EyMwWCzEkVn08cnyFBWS+itMnDJ1zosBQDGw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 18:01:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHN63oOGX1E8n2_N7-m=vhYTf7kXccPvLW3LOkroTNZUzz-wxw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes <netmo.php@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000d8395058b666c6f"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC] Alternative "use" syntax for Closures
From: mo.mu.wss@gmail.com ("M. W. Moe")

--0000000000000d8395058b666c6f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hello,

if you are upset; it's not the place here; your argument is efficiently
based on problems of indentation and handling commas
properly.

Moreover, but not least, you have no idea what a lambda is; if we admit it
what you propose; that is not feasible in PHP; why? because it would
require a preprocessor; in the case presented, it would be necessary to
import all that existing scope then making a selection; nobody wants that
to happen.

If you do not accept any rational criticism; you should think of doing
something else; I do not know; gardening maybe? who knows.

P.S For my use of the "closure" you made a fool yourself beyond what you
can grasp; but anyhow, my dear, it's refreshing, you made smile.

On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 4:34 PM Wes <netmo.php@gmail.com> wrote:

> Welcome to the first inevitable patronizing message... No, my code is not
> smelly. If something is smelling for you, check your armpits.
> Importing 4 variables is not rare. If you think it's rare and should be
> done differently, maybe you should first actually do something with
> Closures before telling people they are wrong.
> And if you use actual names instead of "$var1" or "T1" you will see why I
> am proposing to move the lexical imports where they are the least invasive.
>

--0000000000000d8395058b666c6f--