Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:105937
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOv67gumG=mdj1Nr=uXtRTSdxGOMEu8=TZizdpgf5AsoaRVGDg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOv67gumG=mdj1Nr=uXtRTSdxGOMEu8=TZizdpgf5AsoaRVGDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 23:56:59 +0200
Message-ID: <CADyq6sJX+cAfUrMiGA3_9drMS=+fCVvySNroy0BfNF1VcRxwFg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Wes <netmo.php@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000864c80058b63d8c5"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV][RFC] Alternative "use" syntax for Closures
From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta)

--000000000000864c80058b63d8c5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hey Wes,

On Sat, Jun 15, 2019, 23:53 Wes <netmo.php@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello PHP, I just published
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/alternative-closure-use-syntax
>
> I would love your opinion on this
>
> I know it seems overkill and wrong to have two different syntaxes for the
> same thing, but I really believe that's all we need to fix one of the most
> hated PHP syntax bits.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Wes
>

Tbh, I love the fact that closures have explicitly imported scope: makes it
clear when something is starting to have too many responsibilities.

>

--000000000000864c80058b63d8c5--