Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:105908 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 92784 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2019 17:20:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mout.gmx.net) (212.227.15.15) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 13 Jun 2019 17:20:35 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1560436423; bh=it1+ek7/9jKE8xU2UrZfi0/ceuM++KudDk5c5+9gwyg=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=g90QZ34vOgtPe0CG2tZxWk5hzAmsjJwZy3EiBmzbcVbR9QmA8mcwxEDFTuGNygiQ9 yTxoU8ezGahQo6fxp5RpTfMAsWmmv9bhg3t6PSSWAHjDN8TlwRvPpjH16/1fTYFsdD YvpjV+yR8Hq6gmpBqpSKLJfA/mapqOi4ZvI8fl6s= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.2.144] ([79.222.32.25]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MSc1L-1i4GKM3H9F-00Swyf; Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:33:43 +0200 To: "G. P. B." , PHP internals References: Message-ID: <2184c8cc-5a97-e280-fc6d-33efbbfcaeb0@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 16:33:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: de-DE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:t1MKSj4KBv+ZyhxfiYATJ8A7RXsNeFWPx6GphiFUY4Jnt5F7tW+ +e9W789OUpUfyxArvyFKMVmkggjkSCFk2We9ra/MBbunmlem/n1uNGigsgLs9HCj9fsltt/ jbblgRS8IjuedR+9pDrHdT7KbBcc1Ze+QAIQdk6B9YLMfvvS8+oXsqWW1TNxeyXM//ZOAI9 hvmZ4+PXzDdRGBg7qNkmg== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:aOeCbV1b1q8=:7K4EqxFDYNZtPfJKYCnsdj 64RpjbrmTxfjQ0R2ZM6VqhwIxJLBSQs/BEnwra9iI5C5gk9fq/2I+a0FIzJGTy0KSOJS4cgq2 Q6M1lj2jQe3JNuhvZA6YB2weIiXDuunLo6oRztXCUEXj1eTjxazAfOTfsDb4P1+QefAItc2k9 KXh47xRm7kn6EStTMHOJqfynTIqky8rSCkwAlojmzLnvU+IrIKQT4CCu01t+CRA+TL8Lr+8rA KL1b7MHfFuDOoUon/TbmH0DXqgLpDdh0mV0h9Ka3GsJu3fu1RPjrzQsZgU+l0n5GuUy0K7sBn 9ysY72Th88jRTHUVD0vVI3WPbZ1ALTwcjLuG3F/J/oQL1Fw7xFVf3RVGWhi10eso0/LF5C7Dw uKpnv6KuOKNZJYnDSwm4viLV4JCzmeYwH89yjSXY2IqdQFnpRU0AKxRERAQwBp3ivDXedGyal zQC9v4ILzn9oGEjlydnV8EU0+aHqz8v1Qpb3Ch4WCgSWJOILpEbLR3eDeU1SCHLZIUsmlZruQ BUn8+rX8hyXglS8dyo1B7zhJreFPD1i8XGEPoP7u3dIGlpvQSL++csC87reizYusC80ZRoVWC 9339/qmujalsu0dF3z3TEOmhWmHYAl4xsJQQlpg1SFplxd0MLIj0CL8ERFMjvCc5TdEfsDw4F VdEZVZB+BJUnEFkeYFJKN4uQ7+I/A2DmrhqJPywpB2hcam/LTBHMzU4zSuAsW6M8MnFAIqhhI WdNJZpv1aO8KCqUbbldxknbuh8+M7OdZ1b3zijUu0RToqOPXzVNDbB5po31DjP2ccJisjN7fU iBLHQDkVb/hWBpKU7UDt37dsw2P8MMyNK9sLWyPWVzr6ak8+oMjj2RxdQmCCMLuPeZHTttoz5 4CjUURAYNw+eBSdqyEKjqHJfwCUrrZFTxt03pC61MQYE1NAyBp6HCOeEOQwBHq3qNk3UhAz9T 5ZzPkHvOnxvrImNhCQSZF2gIdcDU3OVXafEBFZbhq5GgJFsXzuJTL Subject: Re: Feedback on state of some PHP extensions, functions, etc. From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker") On 12.06.2019 at 17:32, G. P. B. wrote: > I've been going through the documentation again to remove mentions of PH= P 4 > and found some extensions, functions, etc. on which I'd like to know the > state of them and if it would be wise to deprecate them. > > I know I've thrown in some function aliases again, but only those which = I > think wouldn't have widespread usage. If those should still be kept in y= our > opinion please let me know. > > The list are more rough notes that I took while reading the doc so if > something seems unclear let me know. > > > - The FILE_USE_INCLUDE_PATH constant in the Filesystem extension bein= g > an integer makes it unusable with strict types for file_get_contents(= ) [6] > however it is also used for a flag argument where it can be combined = with > other constants with a binary OR [7] [8]. > Should this be just considered a Doc Bug? I don't think there's still a bug in the docs regarding FILE_USE_INCLUDE_PATH. See the respective note for the $use_include_path parameter. > - Unbundle the NSAPI Extension (if this is already the case, there is > doc error in the membership state of the extension) as it seems obsol= ete in > this day and age as it handles Sun/Netscape servers [24] The NSAPI is removed as of PHP 7.0.0, so the docs should be fixed. > - Unbundle the XML-RPC extension as it is considered experimental [25= ] I wouldn't unbundle ext/xmlrpc because it is documented as being experimental, but rather because nobody really looks after it, we're bundling a modified ancient version of libxmlrpc, and even the upstream libxmlrpc-epi isn't maintained for years. Thanks, Christoph > [6] https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.file-get-contents.php > [7] https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.file-put-contents.php > [8] https://www.php.net/manual/en/function.file.php > [24] https://www.php.net/manual/en/book.nsapi.php > [25] https://www.php.net/manual/en/intro.xmlrpc.php