Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:105769
Message-ID: <F7A34FCD-D067-4E1E-AD58-E4D53A5CA817@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="Apple-Mail=_B3AD87F9-7AA4-4969-A8A3-39ECF9DD7282"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\))
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 10:16:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR06MB285779ADEA21ED467FBDBEA0DE060@DM5PR06MB2857.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com>,
 PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
To: Theodore Brown <theodorejb@outlook.com>
References: <DM5PR06MB285728875FF1272F25FD35E7DE060@DM5PR06MB2857.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <16ad66607a0.27c1.08be835b7d1a2c2edb4c4286afe1a236@gmail.com>
 <DM5PR06MB2857A407C06D8243AF429DC4DE060@DM5PR06MB2857.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <C6EBFEA1-779C-47FA-8C13-838F58A5EE95@gmail.com>
 <DM5PR06MB285779ADEA21ED467FBDBEA0DE060@DM5PR06MB2857.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] High performance function autoloading
From: gadelat@gmail.com (Gabriel O)

--Apple-Mail=_B3AD87F9-7AA4-4969-A8A3-39ECF9DD7282
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii


> On 20. May 2019, at 22:30, Theodore Brown <theodorejb@outlook.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 2:36 PM Gabriel O <gadelat@gmail.com> wrote:
>>=20
>> Yes, this is misconception. Namespace resolutions are cached. First
>> fixer tool bringing support for this was correct: PHP-CS-Fixer auto
>> imports only optimized functions for this very same reason.
>=20
> I'm confused, since this doesn't match what I've read elsewhere. For
> example, Nikita wrote the following last time function autoloading was
> discussed: [1]
>=20
>> Calling the autoloader if a global function with the name exists will
>> totally kill performance. This means that every call to strpos() or
>> any of the other functions in the PHP standard library will have to
>> go through the autoloader first, unless people use fully qualified
>> names (which, currently, they don't). This is completely out of the
>> question.

Check =
https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/comments/b107c5/optimizing_your_php_app_speed=
/eim2lti =
<https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/comments/b107c5/optimizing_your_php_app_spee=
d/eim2lti> which is also comment from nikic.
I guess there is some confusion core maintainers should clear up. =
Anyway, my point was if it improves perf of only some functions, this =
config should be named differently and not have impact on non-optimized =
ones.



--Apple-Mail=_B3AD87F9-7AA4-4969-A8A3-39ECF9DD7282--