Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:105552
Return-Path: <bishop.bettini@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 45711 invoked from network); 2 May 2019 04:58:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-vs1-f44.google.com) (209.85.217.44)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 2 May 2019 04:58:49 -0000
Received: by mail-vs1-f44.google.com with SMTP id b23so480745vso.1
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 01 May 2019 19:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to
         :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=Za74N3V2fFzuaHuTHzCe0SMi4X4irokNn3N/ipxUl6o=;
        b=kYas/F5va+vdKiNEPDVZY7Qf+y7HJip6Yl/Xq8JPkNGt1d8ZGFg4R6JTZt6N8d8gfE
         e5uIHK7DRp2xZ2CV4sZP9Q7G7/KsfkexlJ56EDwQbNBjchiN6qyGyHNMa8XgZz3XA5eO
         +Ug5ZtiFxEnGLbDYP1blywJfi9kqgNarttbNcXbTrRY9p1MGF+dLNjWFYcvN5ZJNS6Zz
         KcJHk2ty20WAXJ45JV4NBkuT3m/DB0vl7Hsd6T2lwQfpIhMAJ5Gkz5HVt0lIChTbr9ml
         jrTl7j5PcRXVp1NROxVxIxP8NXL723CLt3HurJZckQgQTr/MguARt5YiP4FnVgA1r50r
         zXpA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVBbGnvdGJZOm4vw/ZSwuJPizICfFV8TXR6sZ83FXH9bspNbzYi
	DGh5/ap/82rP5V9YNDAaiBEatDxdDCXc9k6rhOs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxpLs/9K6xfgSJpcIDn7SeZrnxlO3iZ5u1chY0lnMn/w3PyYf8mqVmEo3/hTlD8+jmbsgJkrVPpKpjv7BLk1aA=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f30f:: with SMTP id p15mr626089vsf.158.1556762481054;
 Wed, 01 May 2019 19:01:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM5PR06MB28578FFCD3349CF7F41F33FDDE3D0@DM5PR06MB2857.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAEYWF=7dVBsbFUnK27OV7rfg7e=rsZ9jcv0Q=VFKND6p=OPYFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEYWF=7s5CW-zAobmJYvr5hj9-K7gU123WVkjZwnth-p-9uYLQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <9a90b882-b6d5-a36c-20db-318c79cf5028@gmail.com> <MWHPR06MB28613B6142B1E33A8AEC7328DE380@MWHPR06MB2861.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAEYWF=4v5D-wUAKZHWdFzh_0VxcGo418805x5GaMj2BmHH+-3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <MWHPR06MB2861243637784AAAD6E587E0DE3A0@MWHPR06MB2861.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAEYWF=6bJa8WbLMen7s2n_W631GVTVq_un-Z7exVqBkSNxkB0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <MWHPR06MB28613EC76D7655DA38C630E8DE3A0@MWHPR06MB2861.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAEYWF=6B_rJcs__2hbWOOpE-O6Ah9ah94AvrMLjR6QO=DB78kA@mail.gmail.com> <AM4PR0401MB230500D51F1EEA31C2C02577F93B0@AM4PR0401MB2305.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR0401MB230500D51F1EEA31C2C02577F93B0@AM4PR0401MB2305.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: bishop@php.net
Date: Wed, 1 May 2019 22:00:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAEYWF=6ifS8p=6ob54DWG51pjhi5sA9+cqdq=XahsF96vZkYEw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Punt <tpunt@hotmail.co.uk>
Cc: Theodore Brown <theodorejb@outlook.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000aed6bb0587de0251"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Revive Number Format Separator RFC
From: bishop@php.net (Bishop Bettini)

--000000000000aed6bb0587de0251
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 5:42 AM Thomas Punt <tpunt@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> > On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 01:13 AM Bishop Bettini <bishop@php.net> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019, 19:14 Theodore Brown <theodorejb@outlook.com
> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 3:59 PM Bishop Bettini <bishop@php.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Excellent. I hope we can make the case this time. Please
> > > > request Wiki karma [1], and we'll iterate on it there.
> > >
> > > I was granted karma, and published an initial RFC draft:
> > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/numeric_literal_separator.
> > >
> > > I would greatly appreciate help with the implementation, since I
> > > don't have much experience with C and haven't contributed to PHP
> before.
> > >
> > > Also let me know if you have any ideas for improving the RFC.
> > >
> >
> > I am happy to help with these. Let us take the RFC refinement and
> > implementation details conversation off-list. Then come back when
> prepared
> > to present for discussion.
>
> I would think that pretty much the whole of the original implementation[1]
> should
> be reusable (maybe some merge conflicts to fix only). But anyway, I can
> offer some
> support with the implementation, if needed.
>

Great, thanks Tom. Theodore and I are polishing the RFC, then will tackle
the implementation. Besides the necessary merge fixes, are there any
changes/improvements you specifically want to make in the new proposed
implementation?

--000000000000aed6bb0587de0251--