Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:105398 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 77472 invoked from network); 24 Apr 2019 20:24:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.gna.ch) (62.12.172.119) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 24 Apr 2019 20:24:38 -0000 Received: from [10.183.2.190] (unknown [217.192.174.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by darkcity.gna.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1500C2108F; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:25:19 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.8\)) In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:25:18 +0200 Cc: Peter Kokot , PHP Internals List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <609E93CF-099B-446C-AD28-04F1D802C9F0@cschneid.com> References: <0ec42fa9-77d1-a203-8425-e72fdd5071f3@korulczyk.pl> <06473788-a34b-f041-36e6-31d19d8dda4c@cubiclesoft.com> <59cafbfb-2bb0-468c-458f-74bcac780e0f@korulczyk.pl> <004c01d4f09f$880ac320$98204960$@roze.lv> <004401d4faa3$60f83700$22e8a500$@gmail.com> <2f922f17-bc7c-313a-8f77-122e861995be@lsces.co.uk> <5741936F-B1F4-43C7-B815-F9D8030AC7BB@koalephant.com> <49A4B76C-4C62-4CBE-BA20-FBE56CA29AB0@cschneid.com> To: Marco Pivetta X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.8) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] Deprecate PHP's short open tags From: cschneid@cschneid.com (Christian Schneider) Am 24.04.2019 um 19:13 schrieb Marco Pivetta : > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019, 19:10 Christian Schneider, = wrote: > Am 24.04.2019 um 19:01 schrieb Peter Kokot : > > just a friendly reminder that by the time one writes an email here > > these tags can be already replaced with the usual ones. >=20 > A friendly reminder that some people are hosting customer code which = they do not want to touch but will get support requests once the code = breaks. >=20 > - Chris >=20 > That's normal? Everyone has projects to maintain, and breaking changes = are common: they're gonna call you for one anyway: if you don't like = that, then you are in the wrong line of business. See Chase Peeler's point: A breaking change should have a reward big = enough to justify it. And that's what where we (including Zeev Suraski and other core = developers) disagree. - Chris