Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:105283
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF+90c9YZcrquGfS4h3x1a+codkCFLarAThsOXcN69RCTvbAFA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c_keZTbMTuDO+9WRa53MsYxbNxkMO_pxGyymGnxCp691g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAF+90c8yJkuJYuRZZrbnJ1rv7xOv+zUuevP9B+fpok960VQxcw@mail.gmail.com> <2abd0f71-f116-bf3f-7467-88bdc895d057@telia.com>
In-Reply-To: <2abd0f71-f116-bf3f-7467-88bdc895d057@telia.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:48:38 +0200
Message-ID: <CAG9XoMT0NhFRaRicP_26=ZCic1GzVtnj+V2=eqcje7Djbve+5Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Larsson?= <bjorn.x.larsson@telia.com>
Cc: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005295990586903c18"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: [RFC] Arrow functions / short closures
From: benjamin.morel@gmail.com (Benjamin Morel)

--0000000000005295990586903c18
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Even though I was originally hoping for something closer to JS syntax,
considering Nikita's summary it looks like the best contender is still
fn(), as originally proposed.
At least it looks like a function indeed, to the uninitiated.

So FWIW, I think that a vote for the fn() syntax only still makes sense.
The risk with the 2 or 3 options is never being able to reach a concensus:
is a relative majority or an absolute majority for one of the syntaxes
acceptable, or are you required by the RFC process to get a 2/3 majority
for this vote as well? If so, considering the discussion so far, I think
this will be hard to achieve with 2 choices, let alone with 3.

- Ben

--0000000000005295990586903c18--