Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:105078 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28568 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2019 19:11:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-lj1-f180.google.com) (209.85.208.180) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2019 19:11:36 -0000 Received: by mail-lj1-f180.google.com with SMTP id v22so2580228lje.9 for ; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:07:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZYqDXvRaw8Wdstlfng2ZyS5YnCw9HIjwwGxM0GghAjQ=; b=ONGVXDcT0RzZBYLAatsUN1G745azT9syqCKkzsQYbMYnqRQH1Le//iatmizL36YodT ZO0n3NJ5Nbc5Splr4fmrBnhBBOsbC1bwZlRyyNH3PZjZMkwyb9wxALxiL7PA6ZhMKF1G ofMZuRimDAkWs1LvmaGm7CP7gcCoe0U3zW35hjgU1R8O+apqO2shcsrQSJiDr3VKk+Gb +O6ckIAsht9BNkeI/qMgP590NyeHOmsTxgic1On9t8yrJWy6ZF26Lsy8nKHNZ6rSyj48 2DPWKKSbCpfSv5317VafflT0IXw03Rn9+8UiLbf1YHW7fofb2u9UvXxJtR8HdIaMChMc coNA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVi+ruuZwYL+hX3B6XNM6t35rzL/l5xJT/cYDb5dZxEsW+ZvIke PSGdPlg1VwUA7XIhZH//3gVorPSbcISBicekQrk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyzw+n2aiDuKn8HW9hJmzY5FIeOEXk1xhixonIse46m/rcRPAm2AT7qKLp12hQqEBOYoZX9Gw4KCiJG1cy3UW0= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:4715:: with SMTP id u21mr3855839lja.156.1554394035904; Thu, 04 Apr 2019 09:07:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <003a01d4eaf0$c17d6c20$44784460$@jhdxr.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:06:59 -0600 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_Brzuchalski?= Cc: CHU Zhaowei , PHP Internals List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Spread Operator in Array Expression v0.2 From: levim@php.net (Levi Morrison) On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 9:58 AM Micha=C5=82 Brzuchalski wrote: > > Hi CHU Zhaowei, > > Where can I find first RFC version? Revisited RFCs AFAIK should be served > under different name. Look at its history. Using the same URL is fine, as long as author(s) agree= . > Personally I liked key preserve behavior. Without it use of spread operat= or > I array expression would have minor use. But this is my personal feeling > about only. > > I think I'm missing something in RFC. Usage in key preserved array > expression is not covered and the RFC doesn't describe how it would behav= e. > > Thanks for the efforts on it