Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:105064
Return-Path: <mo.mu.wss@gmail.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 51131 invoked from network); 3 Apr 2019 23:34:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-lf1-f44.google.com) (209.85.167.44)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 3 Apr 2019 23:34:04 -0000
Received: by mail-lf1-f44.google.com with SMTP id m13so96112lfb.6
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:29:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
        h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc;
        bh=rvUAwWku70cNJHp/iwija6qxB+YDLfi88R/8v8wPV8c=;
        b=DC6lmBneWB9xehyLbhzOeZAXMzu6VBQpdzEOdPSi/9wFUFwYS/sn1q6sXH0nQuXoGk
         yU5qe6a0uRlzHm+Rsd5hBU20rxu3XpqG9cDbwe9mLkUlQNqdF9RBFq0HFk/hAqPB9pH8
         1OUVPK568e6eLbdmAp/KvM95AYnRqcBCe7M9St5ApMlg3EKTSzg0AhfxYzRwreh9OqZ7
         pYIxogQMFrbI/6C20TYApbQAhkKLHwIDSjkiAHjSzK107cPNWapgHAR9Yo7l2FR60IDn
         r2aUfOeKf0BrVQiEkHWwcZzlgooqAx3uVLilewm5lPOC7awyFhtq+zH0jt08gpLW2jBn
         CxPA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=rvUAwWku70cNJHp/iwija6qxB+YDLfi88R/8v8wPV8c=;
        b=BQ+LhrBKM+hBgxyo2gx2kSQ/Hp2wHcwcuOIeGbG7vWNYj3momDQD6B3zJqehGWwKm9
         ZPDmOqRSwrfyL4xWGjs9ggcXc93S9AZ6mLA1shuC9zW+LlpYer9MlYkxVlg3n675aIT8
         IVnoSxhO2A8dql87xydIYOL1v/cidLqghTov+wlSlUYU9Lik0Au+fptPq5O+HfeUNShm
         uXT7llIL4+EGwL1Pw1pc+IRU6QNP9cG1A3HPi5s5wFuqO3MU1jheOZtY8gYXeEbvEzSi
         5vvt/cSpVKVmK1orI2KAzNDcU8ci6tlDEQfezbfaxdFoXr8mncxU3Mr3bDyomFhPC1tY
         rwVQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXEpLkdNfcp+Lm8vUibxfyGQ++hG3AiixTgC8+/z6uPRB+FMxxg
	7cQFU/SgD38rINytVhYfWG9hmwSXci7KA0bOitE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzAjgeNZpZ8Q4BSD6VwU7ybC7nbW9bcevHo7KsG4jRxKggp1PKJeYFULe7aqhhC6fAtd04Pp4eEYtthX/d9hw8=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5305:: with SMTP id c5mr892056lfh.153.1554323371661;
 Wed, 03 Apr 2019 13:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAHN63oMjO-7cdnF55Mrj-MxVrq9mvm5=c2M681CuXLkE_Hez_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAESVnVpcTTC-77EjLgH-9jwbPgzaR2x_JV+D00SMffWKgU=bkw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHN63oP4p-VdK=J3L3vi0GygHawRq5KkCHJEF0tFoQBtSezGiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALKiJKrbcv42cyWYqLfizzNVGc55Z4qEW+X6gfxzoVENSrnZuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHN63oOfR3DD9b_xHLPUh20=jJFQTJH+Qce298k-4vm6X4bdKg@mail.gmail.com>
 <65AF9E1E-DFA6-47AE-952B-9ABEBD9B6038@gmail.com> <CAHN63oMqOgCgh6voyL0sjXQJEnMKQ=NJ+MXQuU0355EG8Apffw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHN63oMz1YM5c0V7QLGOJ=1LKEasMuHVxwsdbrxC==5Up6=mMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <284d1f9f-03d3-1488-77dd-82e18edf9f4c@gmail.com> <CAHN63oOqx9AxU=ofAQceKEQoJqYTuku1AWGa-sw=BLMTMP0Vjw@mail.gmail.com>
 <db94829a-3ffb-998b-08cd-67eb36ea4cc2@gmail.com> <CAFPFaMK5hs3y5VziAnqDjM1sz3-RLvQUgUj0gQYuxshbd_rFGA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFPFaMK5hs3y5VziAnqDjM1sz3-RLvQUgUj0gQYuxshbd_rFGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 13:29:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHN63oOZ6x6PEOJo=u9gVR-5f+87sD7jpwKnw7kKiohf3LSDLg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "G. P. B." <george.banyard@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006f1e720585a61c59"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Question about adding !function_identifier
From: mo.mu.wss@gmail.com ("M. W. Moe")

--0000000000006f1e720585a61c59
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Thanks!

On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 1:24 PM G. P. B. <george.banyard@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I don't really see the point of it as you self said this wouldn't add a
> runtime check, so in what is it different to a comment?
> More so reusing ! for this will, in my opinion, just lead to confusion as
> people will think it negates the function, this is what
> I would expect it to do at first glance.
> Also comparing it to the nullable question mark is quite bizarre I find,
> why not choose the ampersand for references instead?
> At least it would cover the same "scope", as types have nothing to do with
> how a function behaves.
>
> Best regards
>
> George P. Banyard
>

--0000000000006f1e720585a61c59--