Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104955 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 94573 invoked from network); 26 Mar 2019 11:08:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-ot1-f51.google.com) (209.85.210.51) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 26 Mar 2019 11:08:39 -0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id m10so3010881otp.2 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 01:01:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=5wMJi6Dnj45qBHThhRIvFF8QJQOQVOXGgbe7goOaoFM=; b=r5UEnN7uh7T78N/h0QXst3O0tUqM/uYrgub4OUOiOb9akqtjZPbbqtieS0GIp5aw9J YW8ZYVPHoAeS0NvMSYAzEgr19elGoIyNh5ruBt41qJnNxvmAwY0sIuvpTQ7e5xLW1hj4 Kl3tY6ybpc62CP98vdkqVc48i4e7v9KpSRFiZrIW9jpc/UVsLLtTserRe+UO0FuarLI2 cd4oJ8dzfhY/tFoeu9ZwDzFNYSCAzD0T4+hZIsDANM/X1lczyjFaAIO+mbPX75Zt/bnu 7acxZRobtgTkKgOPhs3YS0XEIXf/d4htSIMnbjItpfZPqVG5Xp3oGmkdtZFBg5tAayKV Pu1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=5wMJi6Dnj45qBHThhRIvFF8QJQOQVOXGgbe7goOaoFM=; b=hLFCAJ5Q4WlGmx7TrSRZiGJ2FqzmE8pojWCUBjPiOBEHHunc5CVlnfMKnDSr90/yF5 ztjtLouGGvzIEuzgZ4UuGut6tirUsoYfZ5nCPz/03eMdVwlcczap5aojcnQnkBehMqpm VAKR9Rb8Fg3eL8dp+nC3t0NhYF7n8DFdNJ8+Tpox35Pf4C6LpS7JLGKr4C2jD3vxAi6u lPKhqVhoZ6t4EV1sGMOCKFQnCqcc5dBgnZVtCccUu6eXfaXvPOGQSebOqz3L2QQ3BfDT gXGUni2Pa2BMMes+PS5C1CgSt47ibNkg5E4oopdakdc5fidTjqdjqPOC95oUh+V9c0Ah 1e5g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVPFCN9iwORpW4k6ACjr2ndxBO164wLru2Ul0RYcUipqFOJHYAK g45dn2oeCgD+Z/IQdt6ttPRhGPVw X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMzPnHulpG3RuzDZ140c7AnV6ov48h69zeFuys/Tuhm4/CAWjynBqIyonz1rZhwr1Q31H07Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1592:: with SMTP id i18mr17998189otr.244.1553587318461; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 01:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ot1-f48.google.com (mail-ot1-f48.google.com. [209.85.210.48]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m89sm7366869otc.7.2019.03.26.01.01.56 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Mar 2019 01:01:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ot1-f48.google.com with SMTP id o74so10627252ota.3 for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 01:01:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:1b2f:: with SMTP id l44mr2940548otl.217.1553587316663; Tue, 26 Mar 2019 01:01:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1D4D58A6-DCF2-449E-9219-8F036B70E50A@heigl.org> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 08:01:21 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: PHP internals Cc: Andreas Heigl , Ben Ramsey Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000233de40584fabc8a" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC Process: more productive conversations From: phpmailinglists@gmail.com (Peter Bowyer) --000000000000233de40584fabc8a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 19:28, Ben Ramsey wrote: > If someone enters nonsense or =E2=80=9Cn/a=E2=80=9D or any value that doe= sn=E2=80=99t justify > their vote or doesn=E2=80=99t appear to satisfactorily justify it accordi= ng to some > metric of justification satisfaction, then does that person=E2=80=99s vot= e get > thrown out or discounted? > During the experiment, not at all. I'm not presupposing any outcome, and if commenting was kept after the experiment and if it was to have an effect like you describe, it would need to go through the RFC process and be approved. > What is the goal of the experiment? > To see if there's a basis in practice for the concern expressed around who can vote and the problems it may/does cause; To see how people respond to being asked to comment, explaining their choice of vote; To see what impact commenting has on the voting process. It would need to be run for a set period of time; perhaps best measured in "Number of votes carried out". Completely guessed without looking at past vote frequency, but say 4 months or 10 votes, whichever is longer. Peter --000000000000233de40584fabc8a--