Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104926 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 14673 invoked from network); 25 Mar 2019 16:59:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO zeona.lv) (213.175.74.1) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 25 Mar 2019 16:59:38 -0000 Received: from MezhRoze (unknown [10.8.0.69]) by zeona.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82852006EC71 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:52:46 +0200 (EET) To: "'PHP internals'" References: In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:52:45 +0200 Message-ID: <000301d4e312$06a88190$13f984b0$@roze.lv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQGcIFfGlc3WAXT7RHi3cV0eE5t8o6aN3aXQ Content-Language: lv Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Deprecate PHP's short open tags From: r@roze.lv ("Reinis Rozitis") > I would like to start the discussion about the deprecation of PHP's = short open > tags: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate_php_short_tags Hi,=20 I did read the initial thread about this and now the RFC and it doesn't = really state what is the reason of removing the short tags besides this = one line: "PHP has provided over the years different ways to indicate the = beginning of PHP code other than the standard " Is there a (noticeable) speed improvement or does it make the = parser/engine more simple? Is it wrong to provide different ways to = indicate the start of php code? Since the short '