Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104801 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 49576 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2019 18:03:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-qk1-f181.google.com) (209.85.222.181) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 19 Mar 2019 18:03:05 -0000 Received: by mail-qk1-f181.google.com with SMTP id c189so12014837qke.6 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 07:54:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HXgOB3AZsqWk/wfxvA5WTQZ/8tNmMsPrkc3GD1d6CEc=; b=HzT5bt99VqvtYgAAYZtoZ9U3a6pfdezaM4CYyiqXsDyWUX04Hzj3pX3JzyjBmMYIvt pvicLAwccBit8rQum+4jT+U+5uoOTBvxcqfHKONZqO/14a9yYMQ6wV8FMIVtuUbbq2A4 wvyNNfBsplhPavLNjzmWc45o4/SEuarsjnMF59sXzqL+3uW3HXAT5ivHAoNwBgS0guc5 fUbfL5rh5f+hu1fZk+iIRtDTraT2utVavwP0agOaVXn+cpdMAwxSnq0tlZRo8r2kXEzc N2DSJFUXZ4SDm8QM8WQiICCjiaHpuLy89R9QlY7dmg5TjRCrzvY3cMSdUgmmGzI+IiGE N86A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUNOLTLuI4YExOQ4MCriuF+UOgwEBOjuCLh/EN5jkL0koG6HAU5 LbmvFIFL5sMs7w8XUmI9ZPuKPJQxBKhJmTPY6QEUBJhRn08= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx5tvq2K2mY7Daj3mvOcR7W5KCzasThdB6bttmjGjkPJxgAWhZ9/gMXVRl1sW50HunFupTFEdYADpfwyxHSscs= X-Received: by 2002:a37:bcc7:: with SMTP id m190mr2238479qkf.300.1553007284968; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 07:54:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2a08bdcd-b98c-1572-2aae-07af61a29a3e@gmx.de> <34920d43-2b90-507c-c96b-8a80a192c4c9@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:54:33 -0500 Message-ID: To: Remi Collet Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008df2e8058473af2e" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: PHP 7.4 Release Manager Selection From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon) --0000000000008df2e8058473af2e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 9:49 AM Remi Collet wrote: > >> Yay! And on that topic, did we come to a consensus on whether or not 7.4 > > was going to have an extended support cycle the way 5.6 did? If so, how > > long was it? > > 5.6 support, as latest 5.x, was extended by 1 year > > I think it make sense to do the same for latest 7.x > (so 2 years of security instead of 1) > I agree and think it's worth putting such into the release process as standard practice. -Sara --0000000000008df2e8058473af2e--