Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104702
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <a70baca7-f0af-49de-9cf9-5421e42e0a0c@www.fastmail.com>
 <CAJW__o31wn8R4oXq2U-G+6VmXTKLuRvYg2zVD4bLXvUuoDxmVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPKYkKx2GVEpFcA+nUB+UcBBGy_Qxhk6aB8qrFLyqfxJTWV_NQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJW__o2GKDYq7YkKm6-Vtco3WFdQ3DCbToA9LUYTThJLGxGaTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPKYkKwct0Py34wqGkSaXVVQDinOMJ4gsDPSPvKsfdtEeRhsFA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPKYkKwct0Py34wqGkSaXVVQDinOMJ4gsDPSPvKsfdtEeRhsFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 23:26:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJW__o1aq+8kcO4f1r2hnzeeiS5ZpywnHhp__ierqBOADEHXnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Chase Peeler <chasepeeler@gmail.com>
Cc: Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>, Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC Draft: Comprehensions
From: kalle@php.net (Kalle Sommer Nielsen)

Hi

Den tir. 12. mar. 2019 kl. 18.36 skrev Chase Peeler <chasepeeler@gmail.com>:
> I've never liked "developers might use it wrong" as reason to not implement something, especially if hard to read/complex code is the worst impact to improper use.
Me neither to be fair, but I think it is a fair consideration to have
when designing syntax. I agree with Stas reply in this thread
regarding this.

> I understand that you are talking about the syntax (which others have said is still up for discussion) and not the feature itself. I still wanted to make the comment above more a general response to that line of thinking.
I like the feature as it is, and if the syntax is right for it then I
would most likely vote for it if it comes to that state.


-- 
regards,

Kalle Sommer Nielsen
kalle@php.net