Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104626
Return-Path: <larry@garfieldtech.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 73571 invoked from network); 10 Mar 2019 22:43:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO out2-smtp.messagingengine.com) (66.111.4.26)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 10 Mar 2019 22:43:04 -0000
Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47])
	by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A678F21EEB
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:32:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap26 ([10.202.2.76])
  by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:32:31 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type
	:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:references:subject:to
	:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=
	fm2; bh=Crzb88RjHZYuTUErVFsXYFkmWkVSkQReVC9raTEAXBA=; b=68JQAadA
	faKk1iylL3UeHgfJ0keaiVkNHdnY7yJujub2GQPplgnF4GpoFQHEle87xqZKc3tU
	Vgh14VVGRCw1X0qo0bHgpC8MWCRjEdKzOK3kTED7NtAtmTuJkmLr/UCZdvhB6Gdr
	77o/xJsGBLv7zaySvgNvMLyBcE9/ybXE9oqSjn8XYSzmfcT9CxcfvR5uizAJn9AK
	Sk8RGEfScgpAWwO+qQef43fBE8mUjfdav/5ni/PMQ2VgjU18AQcTmXTDvT+gFeZe
	Svl7RwnIn8uYtBdOtFmDEJRK0pvA4Xose/uPqOlURRCXVDllMu0/NK27roJpU4M2
	OgQuqOLHeMdCMg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:T2aFXBXksNcwLZDK27EaoDsG6xsMxZJ0f1RtarklDs9SDQGoCGzcNg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrgeeggdduvdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
    fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
    uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqh
    ertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfnfgrrhhrhicuifgrrhhfihgvlhgufdcuoehlrghrrhih
    sehgrghrfhhivghlughtvggthhdrtghomheqnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe
    hlrghrrhihsehgrghrfhhivghlughtvggthhdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigv
    pedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:T2aFXDMCYVL97adZtUPCmSeBLD84GzumxGnc9YC1KzLFZQa8tGFK0Q>
    <xmx:T2aFXBenDeP32D6eAvpf57jDuQYj88z44vaViNqJ6V0uuO6iwV6W-g>
    <xmx:T2aFXKx1NLKphADmxhqL_0Mx6CH7xp8rLZTapV211UkeA7AamoyMFA>
    <xmx:T2aFXPoAdXCrZJvXF8I_9UM8dwTLiFO3E1I8KERkRftKIcxe91H1aw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 69C33B450D; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:32:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.5-925-g644bf8c-fmstable-20190228v5
X-Me-Personality: 10727885
Message-ID: <b7abd39f-3fd4-443f-80cd-18f86364abb6@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CADyq6sJwMaX6vYi9p4V1XVXSa-86nCH6QxmtS0KJ2PX_Cb+4JA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2c497732-96f8-3ef0-bc18-912220fbff4d@gmail.com>
 <CADyq6sJwMaX6vYi9p4V1XVXSa-86nCH6QxmtS0KJ2PX_Cb+4JA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:32:30 -0400
To: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Locked Classes
From: larry@garfieldtech.com ("Larry Garfield")

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019, at 1:52 PM, Marco Pivetta wrote:
> Hi Rowan,
>=20
> Overall good idea, except that I disagree with the `unset()` being
> disabled: that bit is strictly required for lazy-loading purposes, and=

> mostly harmless for userland ("normal" people don't do it, libraries d=
o it).
>=20
> Besides that (blocker for me), if this RFC would be enforced in my cod=
ing
> standards of choice =F0=9F=91=8D
>=20
> Does anybody know if this has potential for engine optimizations?

Marco, have you an example of such lazy-loading tricks?  I'm not familia=
r with them but would like to be...

I'm overall +1 here as well, as I am for most things that allow me to ma=
ke my code stricter and pickier.  (I don't have a strong feeling on unse=
t() either way.)

--Larry Garfield