Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104510 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 63757 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2019 20:59:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-pl1-f182.google.com) (209.85.214.182) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2019 20:59:11 -0000 Received: by mail-pl1-f182.google.com with SMTP id r14so1389537pls.12 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:44:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=basereality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=y+7gVQTOiOu1LR0CSUfMNKiecxg35p89wEHbab1FtSM=; b=R4EdDcdkXuVOPNR5CaESuljMWmIpQzTjTdxbvwAo2Vd9HCX9oeChTTNWwKyUOzWKjv ndvZQIq0i1Bj4R3l4V1QCMRS4oG82BoNrKt1LMvVLPMLgReCUZOE1ULmJvqbLR6K7y0l IGdTLWDtuES4iD5YB/S2sVdPaDgTmw1qJWNn20QII34XQqgeVIX8YJwUkHU380yXAJM7 vSv2Eq1lEMKJCchIEJSokhglp5pqWNtMPb/jJnBAe20XlahLdPCy61lJer8QONPm9/0o unRn+CxUKHSp/z8avllnTtv8tVGmFK50LljX97XaAeKipA6txALdhiRuV8B4kfH5B7E3 tzpw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=y+7gVQTOiOu1LR0CSUfMNKiecxg35p89wEHbab1FtSM=; b=nl3OqUs9NIRKWQYrxkJv6pykoDY8RkEAjBBqZVv+DowVzmpUX+sgZGMp4H3xnz01b+ Vijr4+sXPMJc8AOZIsKo/F2yJb3VEdOSdvUTP+t8G/tVnnN3BxbQy5Wy0EgrpMSydSk2 oPsjyuVbzUnVPWF/K4e9V/2LbB/3+VDcwqEyWVOXe1nDpOGF0SrS2lSO8z98j3r6NYBa 7YDjHA688dX2JxTXCh/qCQWnDYUbUUAudFb4VkS301ucoG9K6GwnySXJHKyNpNq7JEsW LsU3AeNkkLdF37pIIiPSMErYY5y3faFh8RGruxfbVzFjDujk2h4z6g5L0pQS18EsRQ15 cReg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAua7rSOv9z3B048tVC+w7gbTcPMY+AaXJANETkObgoPnsPTK3Tbk sHnqeV/CupannP8mzuaGZEitmtlKrcu8Hd0NOZsjnSLv/hI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaWJfOaN5mLfBz92/qdW9jWiEO9OjpKDkOESjG9d1FRoKcHXGgmm7rBr9ox04Kh/Z2zQL+N58ucaNYx5RyMxeI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:59c3:: with SMTP id d3mr5366872plj.214.1550857476858; Fri, 22 Feb 2019 09:44:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:44:26 +0000 Message-ID: To: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Notes on RFCs that didn't get approved From: Danack@basereality.com (Dan Ackroyd) Hi internals, fyi I have made some notes on previous RFCs that seemed to be well received in general but then didn't actually get approved. https://github.com/danack/RfcCodex The aim of these notes is to make it easier for people to see what happened to those previous RFCs and what hurdles they might need to overcome, if and when someone wants to revisit them. I'm planning to keep adding notes about the RFCs that seem more important to me, but not to be a comprehensive list. cheers Dan Ack