Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104409 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 96963 invoked from network); 14 Feb 2019 17:39:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-wr1-f42.google.com) (209.85.221.42) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 14 Feb 2019 17:39:19 -0000 Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id q1so6662622wrp.7 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:22:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QXywT8joG6fhExFTEAzFveSSU+5ScjljEty9z7IztP0=; b=DmdctK1I2qwIFfF7Ak1ECKYGv7fVC7fRVhUD0lUQRzx9rW3rWvJuCUYfE9HcKkHQZi Ux1ngvNOXbgQvuS6ldISK2Jtc3iNRN1X/z6UVx4eDdPwQxe6eo1LAZLZ+paEThdHRQXx sxRKF7hfekNHlc3BDqjdqaSvBDukvVPbKcmBtQPwid5fMNuubcb+xRzQczxfeHtGYt3k On6j1yU1KqtgW8wDlrwkY1vpswcCYXKaCYZB36Vw6O8a5PK1S2b0PTwbU6PN89cZ/+AD MRYhkR74mcXl6uMDdqoC2k96pT6osKCJLmJnrv2YYAvaAtRmChcG2H8DT1qHsX1E+7uZ LR5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QXywT8joG6fhExFTEAzFveSSU+5ScjljEty9z7IztP0=; b=EafSUYI7t5N6xzCn2kATsqtvHJHYRt60UeaHP6kgciiKJEZEg+nj1yK+vAtIDfhWkL K8PQPyzJU87L4vIKb8eFEykG6wAmh+h1BkIwsiODBdmIgevj40HBRGOCySGB0JyynHQk ViZzrkyUv7r8Q6kxhlVfHl2ecJ2Vcb6/PrTRVgn/mTpeXI3+ywPBptZVVrQ2+vk4TRGU k4SgOFxJWM4gMVhvRnJtHpQZbZpqB2124XjtEj/NEv2LvSkDerBa/wsayKYMWPe2DpRP WX1rBJVTJBklzJY1dZBUUyAfohmm9A/QmAMHygzHk4697taYc492GbMpmHr2D0ZVeWMd IUiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZFlj2wU7dAKHLl1Xu7pDrPt8SxM1X0Hq7gR5igkr0KPKJNdW4j o+r8klEaLXNxnTJiXt2y9JMaLnvzJazQdxQEonM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbFBIRIWXT7hDoZefdJ4e0JtTRXpBFUt2g2/41ouJvEawbYpkmZau7NlOsismdqiENyhEDDQ86SfO8XAecC1zw= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6041:: with SMTP id j1mr2957644wrt.297.1550154163198; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 06:22:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <01178c69-e021-3865-689c-00c3a1902574@php.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:22:31 +0100 Message-ID: To: Arvids Godjuks Cc: Nicolas Grekas , Zeev Suraski , Rowan Collins , Internals , Nikita Popov Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003ea0290581db64e1" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] JIT From: krakjoe@gmail.com (Joe Watkins) --0000000000003ea0290581db64e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Morning all, This idea of an experimental feature as complex as a JIT is dangerous. It is not finished, and dmitry has said he's not willing to put more time into until it's merged. That's his prerogative, and it is ours to say that we don't want unfinished software that only one or two people really understand in PHP. All of the rest of internals need all of the time between now and PHP 8 to educate ourselves on this so that we function as well as we do now when it comes to finding and fixing bugs, and pushing PHP forward. Merging the JIT into 7.4 puts a brick wall in the way of progress that none of us have the tools to climb over. I hear the argument about wanting to test, but anyone with sufficient expertise to test the JIT is capable of building the branch available on github, we do not need to push out an incomplete product to the entire world for the sake of that handful of individuals who will actually test. I believe it is incredibly dangerous to ship 7.4 with the JIT in it's current form, and would ask everyone to please think very carefully about it, prior to supporting it. Thanks Joe On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 14:34, Arvids Godjuks wrote: > =D1=87=D1=82, 14 =D1=84=D0=B5=D0=B2=D1=80. 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 14:54, Nic= olas Grekas >: > > > > [...] I think that whether or not we include it in 7.4 > > > is a tactical decision (and I'm not sure myself where I stand on it), > > but I > > > do think there's a reasonable case for both directions. > > > > > > > If I may add some voice to Zeev's arguments, being able to play with JI= T > as > > early as possible would allow the community to experiment using PHP in > > areas where it doesn't fit right now. Having to wait 2 more years to > > discover that maybe it's useful to build some new libraries could be a > > waste of time at the tactical level (there are other technologies aroun= d > > that move fast also :) ) > > > > Not to detract from the technical challenges of moving in this directio= n, > > of course. > > Just my 2cts from a "userland" guy :) > > > > Nicolas > > > > Hello everyone, > > I agree with this sentiment and the general idea of shipping JIT as > experimental in 7.4 and required to build with a configure flag. > master for 8.0 is going to contain much more and be more unstable and not > practical for testing what JIT can do at that point due to all other > features and improvements going into it like additional optimizations and > platform support. > It will give me, as a userland developer, a platform where I can actually > play with it early and on a stable platform. And I understand what I'm > doing at that point. > > -- > Arv=C4=ABds Godjuks > > +371 26 851 664 > arvids.godjuks@gmail.com > Skype: psihius > Telegram: @psihius https://t.me/psihius > --0000000000003ea0290581db64e1--