Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104209
Return-Path: <me@kelunik.com>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 50280 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2019 22:06:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mo4-p00-ob.smtp.rzone.de) (85.215.255.21)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2019 22:06:40 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1549392471;
	s=strato-dkim-0002; d=kelunik.com;
	h=Cc:To:Subject:Message-ID:Date:From:In-Reply-To:References:
	X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender;
	bh=tLjdZqMtxA6ocgoBcFfCkK8QMQrTZbpwxQV2y0tOT24=;
	b=pvGrPbXfeiZ7gJob5l2ge++8KrRjwSiLkzdD2RxhoTCNZnfDJ0use3wCE8PSpVIIM+
	LUafzQxufeMcJx4k37Xz+D5hVg20K5Fn8LD2A++zGhRFhUQ6MBHYKGl33hE0HxIpnA9J
	wrsVq0AI/mQBA+SuTG7qa5+7UM4e/i5xCg/SPzfuBOGimHU+2+PuYUu7232J4+m679o0
	BNKuQdakv8Da3GvyKzK6WEIT1UDcG3RNLhJV6D6Jp0BpiTwGGVop4W4DjoDwg//agcIs
	0t+xNVDCUVe8/Ngq20FidL9K9CnqCu2i7nLAlXu0SaChcd8Trjj57ezfVGBiw3hHcBnN
	W34A==
X-RZG-AUTH: ":IWkkfkWkbvHsXQGmRYmUo9mlsGbEv0XHBzMIJSS+jKTzde5mDb8AaBYcZi8tcA=="
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from mail-pf1-f181.google.com
	by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 44.9 AUTH)
	with ESMTPSA id 608c95v15IlpOzb
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp384r1 with 384 ECDH bits, eq. 7680 bits RSA))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	for <internals@lists.php.net>;
	Tue, 5 Feb 2019 19:47:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-pf1-f181.google.com with SMTP id b85so1886937pfc.3
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 10:47:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZso1QcAwTu0n+aEpciFE796f3BrlUENr3c08ZPORXapT3WqwN7
	tDrlD/7sNgjQBebzAbzAsyXeO1gREqKK/6PcSlI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbDjGa0uYeMmMKnaCiWQTY8Zzdj1awhcBwCogx0/EDNU4BVylV/uVgkI9Krqmo6XY2TJFc7306hTvih2YQT+6E=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:5207:: with SMTP id g7mr5841365pgb.253.1549392470478;
 Tue, 05 Feb 2019 10:47:50 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR02MB59326E10841277F34E4EFF75BF910@DM6PR02MB5932.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
 <CAEPJduk8zCuVotRKjU54R_hT806hvzrsUs9AguG4G=s7gSwo9w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAEPJdu=XKfAJ_YeeGs21pubeu3CAt6gBzuqHH67g9R+gROsJfQ@mail.gmail.com> <24d0544c-1852-2a72-477d-e6b364dff953@zend.com>
In-Reply-To: <24d0544c-1852-2a72-477d-e6b364dff953@zend.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 19:47:39 +0100
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CANUQDCiBxz-njbCCf2t5NvkBgGLa6WtEmHg4wRE+U2kp5W=h9w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CANUQDCiBxz-njbCCf2t5NvkBgGLa6WtEmHg4wRE+U2kp5W=h9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] JIT
From: me@kelunik.com (Niklas Keller)

> >     Can you give some information on if there are pre-conditions that
> >     must hold for a function to be jitted, or quit conditions that force
> >     the JIT to be reverted for a function?
>
> -dopcache.jit=1245 will lead to JIT only functions with @jit doc-comment
> tag. It's possible to extend this manual control.

Shouldn't we introduce annotations instead of relying on doc comments?

Regards, Niklas