Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104167 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 80411 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2019 13:12:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO tbjjbihbhebb.turbo-smtp.net) (199.187.174.11) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2019 13:12:11 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=php.net; s=turbo-smtp; x=1549965198; h=DomainKey-Signature:Received: Received:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date: Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; bh=Naht6p1NucseWrQH26Wyxe CodCRMhz04VNunlCgj18A=; b=KcOeqLvi9q/WXajORe268zAoNszAkBgSrdfevW 0fhF+GhBeSU53wObgQ0nlpqKNqyk2L2oRZWZH32GFOoea1GAqRBIsyM3xt0lw5gL c/OC7Qqhhw5wf7FHyoiSB3wf21FlVFM+tkV4/Nvzr4R8Z9iXh1drYjVfKGbpC1XE ptLm0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=turbo-smtp; d=php.net; h=Received:Received:X-TurboSMTP-Tracking:X-Gm-Message-State:X-Google-Smtp-Source:X-Received:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:From:Date:X-Gmail-Original-Message-Id:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=OizkWFcaWIZqqNUXR9Z4TEyFQIDZGYr/glmf7wXrVCiHrPHJRGna8CSLG3f+WH +oIph4e8HzZVJ32fYwxO8HlKx16ZDTdpUmSS3dd8iJnnDnnx+zjCRId0K3GIuimC 1hZGL3hW/NlUy0WCZFP6bHlamNgGQGsND0rMHM9R39RmQ=; Received: (qmail 6066 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2019 09:53:17 -0000 Received: X-TurboSMTP-Tracking: 4832235158 X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaehwyW+hwTcmaqd23Ollwubu8ZY6Jmw0qanm0+bZMxZ+XyksRZ yTGDtttb5G7HEL5OS03dnMJL1V/HmSoeWV8gH6k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaU9UVZdrOqJbatQ9+SE88NuHNcPzWCQBh1JXdETD7BFyWsPhruIgCGx7bAaGDKApYEvXFnlLNVASVY3HePQck= X-Received: by 2002:aed:22a3:: with SMTP id p32mr2733985qtc.337.1549360397506; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 01:53:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <03f401d4b96b$18b9dc60$4a2d9520$@php.net> <2734749.8VgiAcunSb@mcmic-probook> In-Reply-To: <2734749.8VgiAcunSb@mcmic-probook> Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 11:53:01 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-Id: Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?C=C3=B4me_Chilliet?= Cc: Internals Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001f5e8605812294a3" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: RFC Workflow & Voting (2019 update) From: zeev@php.net (Zeev Suraski) --0000000000001f5e8605812294a3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 11:07 AM C=C3=B4me Chilliet wrot= e: > Le mardi 5 f=C3=A9vrier 2019, 10:36:48 CET Zeev Suraski a =C3=A9crit : > > Regardless of what you did, actually obtaining full voting rights > > meant you had to ask for a VCS account, and have a reasonably good > > explanation on why you need one - enough to convince one of the folks > > with admin rights on master.php.net to click the 'Accept' button. > > That's all. Immediately, one has identical rights to someone who may > > have been spending years of their time on PHP, in a one way ticket. > > To me that is the purpose of voting, what you=E2=80=99re saying is like > complaining that in a democracy old people with experience has the same > voting power than young ones. > I feel for votes to make sense you need a lot of people voting, a vote > between the 10 core developers does not make a lot of sense, and could we= ll > be replaced by a discussion on a mailing list. > > I=E2=80=99m also not sure why one would need to be coding PHP itself to b= e able to > vote its direction, I feel it=E2=80=99s sane that people using it have a = say in it. > We'll have to agree to disagree on this one. I would say that the way virtually every other major Open Source project serves as a fairly good proof point for my position. In fact, even with the new eligible voting criteria, we'd be well ahead of most other major OS projects in terms of the number of people included in the process with full equal voting rights. Zeev --0000000000001f5e8605812294a3--