Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104147
Return-Path: <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 39902 invoked from network); 5 Feb 2019 03:29:26 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mout.gmx.net) (212.227.15.19)
  by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2019 03:29:26 -0000
Received: from [192.168.2.118] ([87.167.195.49]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003
 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDQI1-1guPLM3R3l-00GmRm; Tue, 05
 Feb 2019 01:10:21 +0100
To: Kalle Sommer Nielsen <kalle@php.net>,
 Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>
Cc: Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <03f401d4b96b$18b9dc60$4a2d9520$@php.net>
 <2455870.Alx54tMJ86@vulcan>
 <CAJW__o0BxHuVnMt_PkDsaD=A1C2HhzcKaYS6frRuYMRYUCJKsw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2083237.emE2DNI856@vulcan>
 <CAJW__o0ELnHtGVAeD3z-nH4ssTeSJDvo3QC5QmyFRgNR3_rgjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <e22f170b-e6e6-cbea-9563-d289d7d3bd03@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2019 01:10:23 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJW__o0ELnHtGVAeD3z-nH4ssTeSJDvo3QC5QmyFRgNR3_rgjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:JnQ7akqhxerg+IAc2o7k1mJKdi8t/nljngTW9e7joTYdXAQtuIA
 8rkgjEoG2I+/xKyHyxkoDbKl72lbilESbh3cKd5bUAS/TUlEsTE9KwIHrZfFw4FMjKDDwG1
 v7ALTrKG2FCyo1OQC1GpQ97STzrPqNfax+Nu8DVY5uh8EyDr/HEghfIZ4TK5e7cNlyv30n2
 BIJylmh3t8uSxWU/Us6CQ==
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:NbMHWQsoTzI=:ZYggc11RNuICTNK2lhO6Pn
 UIv2IZ8dlht8o0OgUzWt9GyYgGAxjpJi80RGCoPtcnxRjerqItswMM11cwgJdYreAhWE0rRP8
 acCZvLU/0xh+FOem+PbDAsRd/V+ohLrUuanCJ7CA75uNet1wVEYUx2uyyD8u9j1EZ6t4a46hA
 WW7bMlsK1Ld+u/ky1afhHn3Cjg96iH6uTENk0i5F3HUQfQvutvAelsqMlQtcSjgYVJREX4yKl
 OkBEXSY9v803GHl0WMwkH5SXYvwK0GLoWqeE238QRzW0STa9oL83vcYTN0EH4ROBs8Z9WXoZU
 cVjf+D5akFrQVHzRRCNt+xpequEgza6nT/c/IKuYhhGTL45xND/XVGuxF1/nLaHrCG5cKjLhq
 cEpJ1ymz/USeIQP3J5KAq/tzPlrqYEyba5wUQ+dESOEFcIPLTUuNB1CFkqW2+zmnli/jMxyqr
 8SAjXsN3HzaHk1s+ydQ9hjcsqg00yQd8zz4KVWU/c36w/oUKj96+pDLQcjHc0vQwQeEkfeaW2
 dsrXf3+TDQan7mpAGl2Yq5WIYdDHx9sinLERKPg6NbT0l0JCJgLnDacoX6s0wR+VSkI/g7BMP
 yX7BWVnirPJjLxgO3W6CXUg03BS3nHYK8xQ2GjL0pBVGFp3+drPfMkOpy+qMXE2NAFQi4F8J0
 XEDcyn0t068pTogD1EQ5AGBv8TDh8HPHnPXlffd+ZpG+oaiJ7AGo3aX93phJc3ppmTetzWF0v
 OMtUC2CgWnDMxhlkPtXrO3yDjn+9CRINF2JQMeXdqYwGRUeXIUX8JlslCada20wTubJwxjZhY
 9JSMOMUh/Owd9JID0MGJKsYZQ3UA1/WxfZOyqZ9JV+1YvSbi67aQYoer/bNPQM7QpFwgFn66r
 2TKGIIv/L6rYNU1a9FvVq/dLHTuXStbc/gfB9AKnp8oYg+gWQ8N15vMM9dXgkf2FokYCRFaWC
 ZCXRaxd3RTA==
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: RFC Workflow & Voting (2019 update)
From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker")

On 04.02.2019 at 23:59, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:

> Den søn. 3. feb. 2019 kl. 19.29 skrev Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com>:
>
>> To answer both you and Sanislav here together, as he raised a similar point,
>> that presumes that 100% of the "invited outsiders" vote on every RFC.  I think
>> that is unlikely, although I freely admit I have no real data to speculate
>> either way.  Lacking any other evidence I'd say it would probably follow a
>> similar pattern to Internals day.  (If we assume a 175 person voting pool and
>> a turnout of about 50, then that's in the neighborhood of 25-30%.)
>> Truthfully, though, none of us have any idea what the total impact would be.
> 
> As a continuation of my answer above to this one; By looking at the
> average turnout of people voting as it is now, there is a 50%+ of
> people with just doc karma in one way or another (single translation),
> just PEAR or even some without any form of karma voting. Looking at
> the list of the 175 or so posted, it is a very small margin of those
> on average that votes for RFCs, meaning that adding externals to the
> top of that, that number in my original email is gonna be a lot larger
> and therefore a lot more dangerous if we open the floodgates like
> that.

In my opinion, the question “who is eligible to vote” is closely tied to
the RFC *at hand*.  For instance, str_begins() wouldn't be much of a
maintainance burden, and whether it should be included into the PHP core
could very well also be decided by some of those who won't contribute to
the implementation/maintainance.  On the other hand, whether to add JIT
compilation may better only be decided by those who would have to
maintain the implementation and who can assess related issues and
pitfalls (I'm none of those), but not by those who only can fancy “hey,
JIT is cool – let's have it!”  It's obviously hard to lay down
respective rules, though.

Anyhow, instead of suggesting some “general improvements/refinements” to
the RFC process, in my opinion, we should identify *where* exactly our
RFC process has failed, and *why* it did so.  Then we should eliminate
the bugs (if there are any).

-- 
Christoph M. Becker