Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:104023
To: Nikita Popov <nikita.ppv@gmail.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <CAF+90c9wcAFmFje0jHKbpUer-Vu1v_8STeZbUPxVSeupAfWuNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <6dd8f281-4261-e096-3416-c7d7911e2201@gmx.de>
 <CAF+90c-ruS0p4j2_GAcViYy62h5D04AUmu0CjyzfhZ7Ch38yPA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <862aa92b-cde6-cdb1-69e3-7b91b5aceeec@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 15:09:21 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAF+90c-ruS0p4j2_GAcViYy62h5D04AUmu0CjyzfhZ7Ch38yPA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: AppVeyor timeouts -- Migrate to Azure Pipelines?
From: cmbecker69@gmx.de ("Christoph M. Becker")

On 02.02.2019 at 14:31, Nikita Popov wrote:

> On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 2:06 PM Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
> wrote:
> 
>> On 02.02.2019 at 13:18, Nikita Popov wrote:
>>
>>> I just learned about the Azure Pipelines (
>>> https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/devops/pipelines/) offering,
>>> which offers open source projects 10 parallel builds with unlimited
>>> minutes. Assuming there's no other catch here, it might be worthwhile to
>>> migrate our Windows CI jobs to Azure Pipelines.
>>
>> An alternative to consider is using Travis for Windows CI[1], too.
> 
> It's an option, but I think we're generally better off using multiple CI
> platforms to increase the number of parallel builds we get.
> 
> Next to the builds we already have, I think it would be very good to also
> have a macos builder (this is supported by both Travis and Azure Pipelines,
> but needs someone familiar with the platform to set things up) and a 32-bit
> builder (probably a -m32 build on x86_64 Linux). That would bring us to a
> total of six builds, which would probably make the Travis queue somewhat
> slow if we used it exclusively.

Ah, makes perfect sense (a FreeBSD CI would be nice as well).

Regarding the execution time of the test suite, it might be sensible to
also have a look at PR #2822[1] and/or PFTT2[2].

[1] <https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/2822>
[2] <https://git.php.net/?p=pftt2.git>

-- 
Christoph M. Becker