Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:103930 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 30154 invoked from network); 31 Jan 2019 19:30:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-ot1-f41.google.com) (209.85.210.41) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 31 Jan 2019 19:30:47 -0000 Received: by mail-ot1-f41.google.com with SMTP id t5so3298889otk.1 for ; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:10:42 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MMeDIsM5F2xVUVJMoHmHt64a6c38KyPJNHrnAIiehbA=; b=n4ZXeDLFRAu5+iWQRhKtJvP/NzOPHyKrjk1AYenGnjzQ8/hAsUABFWaPa308ModgWE KwoYSzs7fDhrhYXbPoGQaYGbJ+VyaTznQ2KsdBcuW07aac61bvxY4lGrq2Lm9l4wSgHB HL1xaaycxUVLVji5ORjG+7PpE9LVGSv4W1/udrzv/lMZlOnjgyVUH1/HrIbW2HGGdTH9 64vxeqtmrYn5TNhVdvxyJz6Sdo7fvucXwHsLrEK/9HhrnZG68j5mYayFNpWFQ2mWgQZN Lhl8cvw+qRmP/ZcRGVyU11piFpevA8TErKiObgYf/iAJrrd9+sksEe9UyWDuvDfmEGrK 2myA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfh31mwOD/w2ZQ1bRku3AyXsXxQKMI4/4K6oVipj+jJFG7KjuY6 bu3FAWdqV/b0q2y3wzacJilm3d4lOpcMUB/KBb4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5JXoD+Zsg6GvXLp8dT0kFccE5NQruwxaTAve6Oeu3N5JYRIm0dLaeSlscGZD/WU0DAJYKbhRrhBBuUf/o0f6s= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5c6:: with SMTP id 64mr26527403otd.274.1548951042320; Thu, 31 Jan 2019 08:10:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <03f401d4b96b$18b9dc60$4a2d9520$@php.net> In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 18:10:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: Kris Craig Cc: Zeev Suraski , PHP internals list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: RFC Workflow & Voting (2019 update) From: kalle@php.net (Kalle Sommer Nielsen) Hi Kris Den tor. 31. jan. 2019 kl. 18.03 skrev Kris Craig : > Given how complex and controversial this question of restricting who can = vote is, I propose that it be moved to its own RFC instead of being bundled= with this one. It would certainly boost likelihood of passage, if nothing= else, as there are a lot of good ideas in this RFC. While that makes sense, I do believe it should be sorted at the same time. This can be solved by secondary votes on how to approach it within the RFC. --=20 regards, Kalle Sommer Nielsen kalle@php.net