Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:103720
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <CAHE1EdtMNi=V=TRRnFyNGkMTjUOUC+2q8EFQs3h3xVHZPnFNNw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+kxMuRxzOQKHwvLwZ0fZMrMD+-2xnu56h6SJyQFN2r2JyQUZA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <10f8dab1-7ee0-e949-a39d-2248a607f1e6@fischer.name>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 21:21:08 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+kxMuRxzOQKHwvLwZ0fZMrMD+-2xnu56h6SJyQFN2r2JyQUZA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam_score: -2.9
X-Spam_score_int: -28
X-Spam_bar: --
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "scanner01.home", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  On 12.01.19 21:13, Dan Ackroyd wrote: > Hi Duncan, [...] great
    points I was about to reply to Craig when Dans' email hit the list. I couldn't
    agree with Dan more. [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (-2.9 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED            Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPqfVsWNUcP2grLYxWCBNuwVEO/PgC87XCeZJz6Oxfx18MO4dpGt/ULh5BWUj+sul2EsBRLfGYTreKLy+pKaRluew3SACFBr35Bga8zahnxsyVLfq++d
 ROZaD/emTaivfkfSXl4B/rmkegTzeq1AeSVBOehZtjLQTI01Rd4dKRk+
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Making stdClass iterable
From: markus@fischer.name (Markus Fischer)


On 12.01.19 21:13, Dan Ackroyd wrote:
> Hi Duncan,
[...] great points

I was about to reply to Craig when Dans' email hit the list.

I couldn't agree with Dan more.

The expanded use of stdClass feels wrong to me, as in: wrong solution to 
a problem best solved differently. Dan gave ample examples about that.

I think one more approach not mentioned is that you could also `(array) 
$yourStdClassVar`. Of course you didn't ask for it, but nevertheless: 
stdClass is already a weird thing on its own and I wouldn't want to see 
it getting more attention to increase the encourage to use it.

cheers,
- Markus