Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:103636 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 72234 invoked from network); 25 Dec 2018 19:50:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO xdebug.org) (82.113.146.227) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 25 Dec 2018 19:50:10 -0000 Received: from [10.13.169.41] (unknown [85.255.233.95]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7619810C05D; Tue, 25 Dec 2018 16:20:49 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 16:20:47 +0000 User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: internals@lists.php.net,Jefferson Gonzalez Message-ID: <07B8181B-DA10-49AD-A4A3-C5AE40684312@php.net> Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] FFI - Foreign Function Interface From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On 24 December 2018 16:37:27 GMT, Jefferson Gonzalez w= rote: > Can people explain why they are voting no to a feature that seems > really well put and thought?=20 There is no need to go from new extension with a new unproven API to direc= tly into core as first try=2E It's much better to try things out in for exa= mple PECL and then to promote it to a core extension when all the kinks are= worked out=2E=20 cheers, Derick