Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:103635
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR02MB5932B1C5B8A707FB8DF76679BFBF0@DM6PR02MB5932.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR02MB5932B1C5B8A707FB8DF76679BFBF0@DM6PR02MB5932.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Dec 2018 09:31:06 +0700
Message-ID: <CAEZPtU5GZhcRhkn78JWsUDvYcPis7pi=LtscVSWGEup_2yUOBg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002e8f51057dcf8241"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] [VOTE] FFI - Foreign Function Interface
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

--0000000000002e8f51057dcf8241
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi,

I agree with the comments about safety here however I still vote yes. FFI
and Jit integration will be a critical part of php in a near future. As I
have seen in the past, it is extremely time consuming to maintain such
implementation outside the core, especially if performance and tight
integration are required. That's why I prefer to give this project more
chances to succeed.

best
Pierre

On Thu, Dec 20, 2018, 10:13 PM Dmitry Stogov <dmitry@zend.com wrote:

> Hi internals,
>
>
> The FFI RFC is turned into voting state.
>
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/ffi
>
>
> There were very few minor changes since the initial proposal, e.g.
> renaming FFI:array_type() into FFI::arrayType()
>
>
> Thanks. Dmitry.
>
>

--0000000000002e8f51057dcf8241--