Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:103597 Return-Path: Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 9459 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2018 19:12:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO atvie01s.evermeet.cx) (77.244.245.66) by pb1.pair.com with SMTP; 12 Dec 2018 19:12:53 -0000 Received: from [192.168.178.28] ([194.106.246.136]) (authenticated bits=0) by atvie01s.evermeet.cx (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id wBCFeGTF014720 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:40:16 +0100 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 atvie01s.evermeet.cx wBCFeGTF014720 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=evermeet.cx; s=default; t=1544629216; bh=jWqqZmgm42LN8g0plfGZWBr6IU6JNycPJMki5nNNZn4=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=e0S1wZeqmci7x5HywXk4HPmAJpOLuUEDWnJk/DdlA76pwVPBHmsiJ6Y5oxvbirtha LFW4FGC2sCgvoMSzsfI5Fag+AvzCO/CgXKyLLn5Me9A/kcfeOxMcTFzovKTLSPCja2 1o7e64kiKe9hXEv+SmdbhdJGliBi6H9YrFUHUy/c= To: Jakub Zelenka Cc: PHP internals list References: <2e358c47-f07d-2bd0-dcbf-8ee1282f1ea1@evermeet.cx> Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <4ced5e72-7f71-dac2-cee7-cab5ea0e18be@evermeet.cx> Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:40:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] configure bug with static openssl 1.1.1? From: tessarek@evermeet.cx ("Helmut K. C. Tessarek") On 2018-12-12 16:37, Jakub Zelenka wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 3:32 PM Helmut K. C. Tessarek > > wrote: > > On 2018-12-12 16:11, Jakub Zelenka wrote: > > > > You should create a bug report. > > > > Please note that a static configuration has some issues (e.g. > > https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=73609 and think there were more issues > > maybe). Basically it's not well supported so I would recommend to do a > > shared build instead otherwise you are probably on your own unless > > someone finds time to look into it. > > Thanks, Jakub for your reply. > > Hmm, I checked the link you sent, but this ticket has nothing to do with > linking against a static openssl library. > > This ticket mentions that openssl is not supported as a shared > extension. But that is not what I'm doing. > > I try to link against a static openssl library. But it works when > linking against a static openssl 1.0.2 lib. > Therefore I highly suspect that there's a problem with configure. But I > will open a ticket, and I will also try to link against a dynamic > openssl 1.1.1. > > So linking against a static openssl 1.0.2 works, but against a static > openssl 1.1.1 does not work. > > However, linking against a static openssl library should be supported. > Years back people even suggested to always link against a static openssl > lib because of security reasons (no hijacking of dynamic libs and > whatnot). This might not be relevant anymore, but there's no logical > reason why linking against a static openssl 1.1.1 should not work. > > > Ah I see! Yeah I think it should work so it might be a bug if it > doesn't. I would suggest to create a bug report. Will do. Thanks, K. C.