Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:103094
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.223.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJd4=YZGM+geKUkJj0F915nCYqdsHFD4YMOrfUraO3GF1NYKtA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <17d2f65a-0e39-feff-5e3d-2ac739582cd6@gmx.de> <CAH-PCH60a=UUmU7NE93qQ3JVNCDOL_ac8CTc+EjR3foCEkYJmA@mail.gmail.com>
 <380147d2-9734-78d5-0631-b8f0d2b0ca8d@gmx.de> <CAJd4=YYv4jk9=QzPRNik3jgcHMXyBbcDDfiFqpiYk4mPRGwPHA@mail.gmail.com>
 <8ad20fc3-575d-5718-2220-60b230186b20@gmx.de> <CAJd4=YZGM+geKUkJj0F915nCYqdsHFD4YMOrfUraO3GF1NYKtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2018 09:17:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CAH-PCH7ZaXj6qQzgfcekYbwP=zsQt9nAR=eOmq2VzJFLiVEJrg@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Pedro_Magalh=C3=A3es?= <mail@pmmaga.net>
Cc: "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@gmx.de>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f58064057354446b"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Status of ci.qa.php.net?
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--000000000000f58064057354446b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:07 AM, Pedro Magalh=C3=A3es <mail@pmmaga.net> wro=
te:

> On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:19 PM Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
> wrote:
>
>> On 01.08.2018 at 20:29, Pedro Magalh=C3=A3es wrote:
>> > If anyone finds some value in having something like this and wishes to
>> > revive our instance, I'd be glad to help setting it up. If we feel tha=
t
>> > Travis + Appveyor are enough, that's fine too :)
>>
>> Well, on further consideration it seems that having our own CI would be
>> nice, especially if we'd run further test suites or different
>> configurations there.  On the other hand, someone would actually to have
>> a look at the test results, and act on failing tests.  Any volunteers?
>>
>> --
>> Christoph M. Becker
>>
>
> I'd say that if we want this, then it should be integrated with github an=
d
> be a third check (next to travis and appveyor). Depending on the stabilit=
y,
> it could be a required or an optional check. This would be better than
> expecting someone to manually check it.
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>

the integration part is the easiest ( all of the mainstream products are
supporting github and the pushing the build results ).
I think first we should figure out what do we want exactly, what is missing
from our current CI pipeline (more platforms, more resources, we want to be
able to log into the build environment for better debuging, etc.),
depending on the answers we can figure out if we want another SaaS offering
or to build our own and what product/tool do we want to use.

--=20
Ferenc Kov=C3=A1cs
@Tyr43l - http://tyrael.hu

--000000000000f58064057354446b--