Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:102783
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain pthreads.org from 209.85.217.181 cause and error)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAESVnVp8JfhpWJBN1dz+LxDd_qaiHDoBMSATRitnrV3Lot1-ZA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL=_i_ngW=NOe=T8VKReF7ov-3OhRM228QFZyWfg5aWPw9uSdQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <c5fb1d3e-e31a-88b5-a2fa-c87dd8471c39@gmail.com> <38809703-3aa1-34cf-82b9-019ee8788cb9@gmx.de>
 <CAESVnVrZCGTZ3mSWPirCCxu-NCOaO9MSffz2wE7rsQYWjVYEww@mail.gmail.com>
 <58.E2.57182.05E864B5@pb1.pair.com> <CAESVnVp8JfhpWJBN1dz+LxDd_qaiHDoBMSATRitnrV3Lot1-ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 06:37:33 +0200
Message-ID: <CAL=_i_kRmNZLvwh6XDCMKYc55W9kMT-rVz6CKqaeQ+AdBgPf-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>
Cc: Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000381580570c5ec83"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] abolish narrow margins
From: pthreads@pthreads.org (Joe Watkins)

--0000000000000381580570c5ec83
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Zeev,

> I think our voting rules are in need of a much thorough review than just
pushing the limit to 2/3 - which also IMHO doesn't tackle the difference
scenarios that exist out there.

Agree, they need reform, but rather than trying to discuss and pass a
monolithic RFC that tries to solve all problems, I chose (a year ago) to
start here; Simply raising the bar simplifies the rules we currently have
and so simplifies their reform (in detail and process).

I'm not following your logic for further delaying voting on this RFC, in
fact I don't see any logic, just an assertion ;)

Cheers
Joe

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 2:22 AM, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:10 PM, Andrea Faulds <ajf@ajf.me> wrote:
> > 2/3+1 is silly, though. 2/3 already means there's twice as many agreeing
> as
> > disagreeing, having +1 doesn't serve the tie-breaking function there
> that it
> > does for 50%+1. But that was indeed a knife-edge RFC, it was actually
> saved
> > by someone chosing to vote Yes at the last minute.
> >
> I can buy that argument, but since there IS room to disagree, then
> such should be spelled out clearly in the voting update RFC.  Let's
> decide and not leave it to subjective interpretation.
>
> -Sara
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--0000000000000381580570c5ec83--