Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:102775 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 64604 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2018 20:52:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2018 20:52:04 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=vsuraski@gmail.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=vsuraski@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: vsuraski@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.44 mail-wm0-f44.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.44] ([74.125.82.44:38455] helo=mail-wm0-f44.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 73/D0-57182-0FD664B5 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:52:01 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 69-v6so3825237wmf.3 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:52:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=MRPXlfEQqJ1c81SKanPO+IbfKWoK10gSzzNCbeGO174=; b=Ub3Xkfk2Jq6MP691wal/GC2EobHfHdo+6VG3gRdo/6FR3zNGPPS3AlmzYarz0w8hpl nGxEp9k5ITC7lLYfPbBf0jMc+CE16Lyn41SzQI5xM4r//YX+CbFG1WLkVv5tXJd63jw7 nyRpPf85cuG1kFNYK9OMhwkLUahET8LN95lzqg8LUgYz9xe3SP5cZuTyiE+M1fF5HneS niPIJpX+MpF+68XiLXuaDiCxe9GTZsB5pCSB8piDePWzJzy4j8MqBrZ4x/6ZizSkcmDp 0yHmvRDBpJGIxLXX496I4brqkZXYXT1weS2mRqM8uk50jyk00qlm9iAg2bCf4NZxS9+W /Lnw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=MRPXlfEQqJ1c81SKanPO+IbfKWoK10gSzzNCbeGO174=; b=UWSYUN8RSXC4F02MVgRL1m87M5thOR2f8itvmyc8nIC/zteWi083hy547izJmkWZga N98X+c2gazsfFGL6l6dPYu41Y8+SJIVcx0uPV3EipH39CQl2BdHQKgo/XLZfGvslUykv djVZRzkr2zu44E77Yg+VejJN87ssuTG0MKm42b2tKFZZVU7HuQCeUwBiUDYTeWAaSi/H xlb6yecyiQ1E2HQTrs5b+YqPKHm+tQBDkXfk/DXvi6x0cLXzVIcEJ2vOXFhXayI2wcHw pAHp0BqpzoIl80ObJRI65igr8GLZzfqGBsE4zygbXJ0QIiErqx20+ElqmZhI1iw5YVNe ZvjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlHPVtH0bMnTkXvYfe0TM2a628Ub1P1/g+UM2dHveSBWfjh4q1Jq DbFP8dFGvvfsskzXQHYN8tN1AZdS X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpe5uhq7CEa9HGIgqKZsANqeJB2o6X0kGvC4DtwqmmW7v9XwFs7ijVncIkOAPllzUMQP0LkWng== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:6b90:: with SMTP id a16-v6mr68984wmi.74.1531342316498; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:51:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eCenter710 (bzq-84-109-129-203.red.bezeqint.net. [84.109.129.203]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y189-v6sm2756224wmd.19.2018.07.11.13.51.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:51:55 -0700 (PDT) To: "'Joe Watkins'" , "'PHP internals'" References: In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 23:51:52 +0300 Message-ID: <020201d41959$00e30a10$02a91e30$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQGWUGgaK9MtEXcUPlw0AJPVwcONVqUGDZQQ Content-Language: he Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] abolish narrow margins From: vsuraski@gmail.com ("Zeev Suraski") > -----Original Message----- > From: Joe Watkins [mailto:krakjoe@php.net] > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 7:41 PM > To: PHP internals > Subject: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] abolish narrow margins >=20 > Afternoon internals, >=20 > I'd like to bring https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abolish-narrow-margins to = vote in the > very near future ... >=20 > We discussed it a year ago, and discussion died down to nothing = (possibly > because it was sidetracked); If there are no objections I'll bring it = to vote in the > coming days ... Last year I worked on a bigger rework of our voting rules that tackles = this, among other topics - given the many deficiencies of the original = Voting RFC (which was hastily drafted, approved with virtually zero = discussion, and yet has been considered as some sort of constitution = ever since). I admit I didn't have the mental strength to bring it up = for discussion but I think our voting rules are in need of a much = thorough review than just pushing the limit to 2/3 - which also IMHO = doesn't tackle the difference scenarios that exist out there. I think it would make sense to start discussing that (as well as the = abolish-narrow-margins RFC along with it if you prefer to put it to a = vote) as soon as we're done with the 7.3 contents, and in preparation = for 7.4/8.0 (i.e. around the September/October timeframe). We could of = course start discussing it sooner, but at least I don't think it makes = sense to vote on either of these right now. Zeev