Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:102768
Return-Path: <php@golemon.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 46828 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2018 17:10:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 11 Jul 2018 17:10:10 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=php@golemon.com; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=php@golemon.com; sender-id=softfail
Received-SPF: softfail (pb1.pair.com: domain golemon.com does not designate 209.85.208.49 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: php@golemon.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.208.49 mail-ed1-f49.google.com
Received: from [209.85.208.49] ([209.85.208.49:36480] helo=mail-ed1-f49.google.com)
by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
id 43/EA-15421-DE9364B5 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:10:08 -0400
Received: by mail-ed1-f49.google.com with SMTP id t3-v6so19726520eds.3
for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:10:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=golemon-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
:subject:to:cc;
bh=ZWmVwrcs0DKDFaK9hnutzw0DSJeeNgCgLgLeaC+3xWg=;
b=re8BW6VMvTPmHPt6Wsq0sb7ACWPRYhc6OJ9yrSXOGSqLKSZrEscFgwaP3o7SP7Ra2o
K1qJaEEOxpeWS6GqTsjvfJB/tUWvu2Fo35aMkBBxnb8rFWs1/v0Wr7zCiDRIkoPOSyG9
N4rD0nuYmrIX3sC3AtT0YIj0qzXqrwyYBw6w4wPtAkeNTQ5H3DF/pQ0ppxO3yYJInb68
4doVWePJHO+8kPv+/UCc/wLxjDsaSqcgBN6jXVf0s1HRIm3Kco/thw16DWcHi0ZQ47T+
YBHrRde8+TRZnQhZBmGPMd6knfJopwS+Kp85wH7L7ErNnVJ8wLVRvoo3NjTItnjke05o
NPjg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
:date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=ZWmVwrcs0DKDFaK9hnutzw0DSJeeNgCgLgLeaC+3xWg=;
b=SlY2y2HzyRAG/26QJLwvXVPHIS91+562fkwMMYKr7APs+6LoRM8c5XnWXxY3r64OXS
FAn9A9ihJU82R/ZRZT+80ikZx7Gc0n7GCbx9whkBQDd1DQOmTzY7s9CbkKDEWznfwXHh
XWF4h4rPHm0P28n49ZdfTnZ1pC75w6snGo0fwdcGuQDUZ/kufBfR9dfgWmD5+CQAkaae
mfl3xo5f+QfdCak/jZNt5hYIBb/7hm1fchytEz9AqRuXREQXr+549kHDEI58zUP5s3L/
lbsbnRghZu3XZHh09Ao6prxv6WXjozRKkPRPz+2SOBHpPLWvVeTJLYOQm3ICy2CsJzku
rL9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E3dZCYXGjaD+eE/VatkU6TpG0a6g7B4f4L64vcXX3WtjagQ9ze+
gFBm5OgH5G+qjvDv2JrL5Gv2Zi2sfF/7AX4QUwAIeF3Cbs8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpcaBxpEEmyKvwySEf+/XsjY28UhLgbCKDmh0jemdQArCDsKq8YwaelQTfloNtRgVV3HGxU60DeQFfZlnT42SSI=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:cd07:: with SMTP id z7-v6mr11608038edi.60.1531329002497;
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:10:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: php@golemon.com
Received: by 2002:a50:8617:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 10:10:02
-0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [206.252.215.26]
In-Reply-To: <CAL=_i_ngW=NOe=T8VKReF7ov-3OhRM228QFZyWfg5aWPw9uSdQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL=_i_ngW=NOe=T8VKReF7ov-3OhRM228QFZyWfg5aWPw9uSdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:10:02 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: aM352qiVqVxr6DAwbCKxVA1nsSo
Message-ID: <CAESVnVrjhMPaDYoRwcrwZGej6Qq59CeGyZAez=Z7dntX+--wGQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] abolish narrow margins
From: pollita@php.net (Sara Golemon)
On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Joe Watkins <krakjoe@php.net> wrote:
> I'd like to bring https://wiki.php.net/rfc/abolish-narrow-margins to vote
> in the very near future ...
>
> We discussed it a year ago, and discussion died down to nothing (possibly
> because it was sidetracked); If there are no objections I'll bring it to
> vote in the coming days ...
>
"The current political climate of Earth shows us that votes that are
won by narrow margins build resentment among voters, can lead to
instability in the ecosphere, and could be considered harmful to
democracy."
Snicker... I want to vote for this purely to make that sentence part
of our bylaws.
In all seriousness though, I'm in favor of this. 66.666% isn't an
unreasonable bar. If you can't get 2 out of 3 people to think your
idea makes sense, then it might need work.
-Sara