Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:102645
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.48 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAF+90c_L7S+EB8YxdNNpNZ7NhhYwCbwEw5_TSnSwUNN-zLVvCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <b4a9394a-184f-906a-0e34-c14cf8172666@gmail.com> <CA+kxMuQk_5KJT5RPK6B2+4whS1Wz4NTxLDAhXkc0uSurxPNLPw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAESVnVrFsZCEbwTTs+ROF19nHh6=XN6dhHJqxVw5EKa5bK5ngA@mail.gmail.com>
 <c2b3a7b2-b4b6-db88-a7c7-5a08fed0d8a4@telia.com> <CAF+90c8tNO1SsMjGnW9tGPGHtY4kD07SNS-qC_LfkVXVsp0GUA@mail.gmail.com>
 <10e578d7-7a24-3ca0-ca0d-d5ed1a39dca3@telia.com> <80a8f588-05a3-48e5-bf40-bf1685b3105e@gmx.de>
 <CAF+90c-gOKrnHtLv1oJuHQ9QWxYjEZHwAzzaUL0c18x48=HezQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <bd79bc16-ff3d-1c9b-a775-9c50c422b8a2@gmx.de> <CAESVnVpHhKPBsTQgu=4u3UPC1oF_e6-iW9_njbq+09WTQb+Oqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAESVnVogxMdbdObdS2Kz-+WP5U=+VvzVXfr55Qy6iYNg=2Z-Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <5cc6a95f-0033-3a8e-2cd6-dc47d0a41730@gmx.de> <CAESVnVoOD_SYHrwmgOKR+zyaDGwLd6SZigNrAv_vp1pFSeomdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <65f1b8bc-a78f-39bc-a544-edcfa41a3119@lsces.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <65f1b8bc-a78f-39bc-a544-edcfa41a3119@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 10:28:24 +0200
Message-ID: <CADyq6s+H84P_RoyvrupcoYRPeFea9-Cqytus8P2iZgD=MAqgpw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>
Cc: PHP Internals List <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e4add8057078aeb8"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Typed Properties
From: ocramius@gmail.com (Marco Pivetta)

--000000000000e4add8057078aeb8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hi Lester,

Typed properties combined with value objects (quite widespread technique)
provide a decent level of safety at this point in time.

So far, there haven't been many nay-sayers to the patch: it's OK to vote
"no" if you don't understand or don't want the feature.

Greets,

Marco

On Sun, 8 Jul 2018, 10:19 Lester Caine, <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:

> On 08/07/18 00:35, Sara Golemon wrote:
> >> Personally, I think even independently of typed variables, typed
> properties feel like an 8.0 feature, not a 7.x feature.
> >>
> > I probably agree with you on that. (Again, still undecided).
>
> The debate seems to assume that Typed Properties ARE a done deal even
> without a vote? Personally I just feel all this is still going in the
> wrong direction and trying to work out where to go next is still
> detracting from getting new work done. In practice if I need 'typed'
> anything, I need types that actually return an advantage, and
> unrestricted 'int' and the like is NOT providing that!
>
> --
> Lester Caine - G8HFL
> -----------------------------
> Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
> L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
> EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
> Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
> Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>

--000000000000e4add8057078aeb8--